It's a real apple with real blades stuck into it. That doesn't make it abstract, that makes it surreal. No?how many apples do you see like that, that is not an apple in 'recognisable reality'.
Abstract photography is the same as abstract art. With both mediums you are concentrating more on the form, colour and texture than you are on the object. You cannot seriously tell me that a painting of an apple with blades sticking out of it would be called abstract!you cannot apply the same guidelines to abstract photography as you can with art, because with photography you are capturing reality (unless you have a very posh lens that has a worm hole etc in it).
No(see where i'm going with this?)
Abstract photography is the same as abstract art. With both mediums you are concentrating more on the form, colour and texture than you are on the object. You cannot seriously tell me that a painting of an apple with blades sticking out of it would be called abstract!
Abstract photography is the same as abstract art. With both mediums you are concentrating more on the form, colour and texture than you are on the object. You cannot seriously tell me that a painting of an apple with blades sticking out of it would be called abstract!
Not bad, was my first entry ever. Epic Fail on impact however![]()
I'm sure I've read it somewhere but can someone briefly explain tech/theme/impact marking scheme?
Interested to hear your thoughts on that matter, El.Personally the two photos that won, are not of the same quality in my opinion.
Was there a private message function on here? I need to contact Danza re the next theme isn't it.
And as I didn't before, I'd also like to thank the judges for their time.![]()
Yep, we've corresponded, you'll be receiving an email from Danza.Any update on a theme? If you decide can you please email it to me (in trust).
Interested to hear your thoughts on that matter, El.
abstract
1 theoretical rather than physical or concrete.
Then explain how an apple with some scalpel blades sticking out of it is abstract. It's not theorectical, as it's really there, and it's a recognisable object.