@Damarus
Ive seen them sporting bluray in their adverts, which is the norm for an advertisement is it not? Show off something good your product has?
Why would they ever say "this can also be done on a dvd9 console"
Ooh, I am intrigued at where I'm wrong half the time?
I'd like to think I'm pleasant everywhere.
Hang on, isn't NokkonWud supposed to be a a microsoft loving, sony hating? I'm getting confusedyour a sony loving, microsoft hating Jew and your going straight to hell. and you know it
ps i love jews. they are awesome![]()
Hang on, isn't NokkonWud supposed to be a a microsoft loving, sony hating? I'm getting confused![]()
I disagree, the price is too high to just concentrate on the games, they have to sell the machine as well.They should be concentrating on trying to sell the games, not the hardware. Once people start wanting a few games for the PS3 they'll take the dive and buy the console, the console will basically sell itself.
They shouldn't and don't need to say anything about it, especially on adverts showing off the games. If they want to advertise the fact it has a blu-ray, then do so on a separate advert and tell the customers that they can play blu-ray movies, don't lie to people saying it makes the game better because not everyone is clueless and will pick up on it.
I disagree, the price is too high to just concentrate on the games, they have to sell the machine as well.
Blu-ray isnt just for playing movies though! If a game is over 9Gb, which Ratchet & Clank probably is, its likely theyre going to advertise the use of blu-ray surley? As theoretically the game wouldnt of been possible? Maybe when higher capacity discs are the norm like DVD is/was, then it will not be feasible to advertise it.
I very much doubt ratchet & clank is over 9gb.. And even if it was I had no problems changing CDs/DVDs in the past and I'm sure I wouldn't have any problems in the future too. I think people often forgot that you can use multiple CDs for a game and that it was done so often in the PS1/PS2 days.
people who just want to play games right now should be buying 360's, basically.
Thats kinda missing the point in terms of Sony advertising Blu-ray but you'd choose to swap discs rather than not?![]()
I realise I sound quite anti-PS3 but I'm not really, I think it's a great piece of kit and for what you get it's probably better value than a 360 ... it's just I feel some of the things such as blu-ray were not really needed and all it does is jack up the price of the console for people who just want to play games.
OH MY GOD 360 LOVER!
Well yeah it's better than mis-leading advertising from Sonythought the PS3 struggled to deal with games over 9gb anyway?
christ no, never owned one and i wont untill they sort their little production issues out. ive had a ps3 since launch. people here saw it as a very expensive gaming console, and rightly so. i saw it as a very cheap (and the best) bluray player / media player / cd player / sacd player / picture viewer.....and gaming console. i do love my ps3, but thats because i use every feature on it. if i'd have just bought it for gaming, i would have been thoroughly let down.