My New Watch

[Coolasmoo]

The No 12 digit touches the rolex Crown on one but not the other

 

[SideWinder]

Hmmm, the number 5 on the bezel is quite different as well...

I'm being slow, explain?

 

[yantorsen]

compare the cyclops and date with this one

infact on that one the white circles on the face dont have a silver outline and nor are the hands the correct colour

 

[SideWinder]

yantorsen - Turn off flash on your phone camera?

 

[G-MAN2004]

I'm being slow, explain?

It looks slightly different?

Also, the crown is closer to the top in one, but in the other, there is a slight gap.

 

[yantorsen]

yantorsen - Turn off flash on your phone camera?

I tried that but it was too blurry then.

 

[caff]

It's a watch.

 

[Super Tigers]

compare the cyclops and date with this one

50 on the bezel are clearly different. To the OP any chance of a box photo or pics of accompanying paperwork.

Rob H

 

[Super Tigers]

try this one as a good guide from a reputable supplier.

 

[yantorsen]

50 on the bezel are clearly different. To the OP any chance of a box photo or pics of accompanying paperwork.

Rob H

my dad is looking after it atm (im only 16), I'll ask him for it when I next see him.

 

[howsertrading]

I can see a crown on the hologram which i believe was not on hologram stickers until 2002,and so I would expect it to have the micro-etched crown on the crystal glass.I would have to check the dates to be sure though.

 

[yantorsen]

I can see a crown on the hologram which i believe was not on hologram stickers until 2002,and so I would expect it to have the micro-etched crown on the crystal glass.I would have to check the dates to be sure though.

although the magifier on the bubble appears to be wrong aswell so if the glass was replaced, which wudnt surprise, although a bit dodgy i admit, because my grandad was rather clumsey in his old age.

 

[G-MAN2004]

although the magifier on the bubble appears to be wrong aswell so if the glass was replaced, which wudnt surprise, although a bit dodgy i admit, because my grandad was rather clumsey in his old age.

To be honest, all the pics posted so far all look different.

Who cares anyway, it means something to you.

 

[howsertrading]

although the magifier on the bubble appears to be wrong aswell so if the glass was replaced, which wudnt surprise, although a bit dodgy i admit, because my grandad was rather clumsey in his old age.

Do you actually want to know wether it is fake or not,as I guess we are being rude by trying to say if it is or it is'nt without you actually asking to know?.

 

[yantorsen]

Do you actually want to know wether it is fake or not,as I guess we are being rude by trying to say if it is or it is'nt without you actually asking to know?.

well it won't really make much difference to me, but i'm happy for people to discuss it and im always happy to learn

 

[howsertrading]

what is the model number on the hologram ?

 

[yantorsen]

what is the model number on the hologram ?

16 something, the rest has rubbed off.

 

[Andr3w]

I like the look of that watch

 

[yantorsen]

I like the look of that watch

Thank you

 

[howsertrading]

16 something, the rest has rubbed off.

OK,really needed the rest of it to be any use.
If you have a magnifying glass you could look for the micro-etched crown on the bevel of the crystal glass,at the 6 oclock position,you might not see it with the naked eye.

Bear in mind that all these extra little things are just for clarification,the reality is that the chances of the watch being real with that cyclops on it are miniscule in my opinion.