Actually, Stoke should have been beaten, they aren't very good. The stuck everyone behind the ball against us and we were awful, we didn't scrape a 1-0 because they were good, we scraped a 1-0 because we were awful.
Liverpool should have blown them away.
As for the comment above from Tombstone I think saying that if they (Liverpool) win, and Chelsea don't win, then you have a 5 point gap, but the case that might be, your threat was Manchester United and their games in hand.
As it stands though, I don't think we'll beat Chelsea tomorrow playing as we are. We need Rooney to be amazing.
Tell you what, it's great to finally be in the premiership

Every game we've won, or drawn it's because the other team were awful. Were you at the stoke - manure game down at the Brit? We had our fair amount of chances and were dissapointed to not win, let alone lose. I agree some games we have been dire and have defended heaviliy but we are trying to survive. It's our first season and we need to stay up in order to build. Prefer Pulis told our players to role over so your nonce players can win easily?

Against Liverpool yesterday I saw it as 2 points dropped. We had enough in the latter half of the first half and spells in the second to put the game behind us. I thought we had by far the more clear cut chances.
If football actually followed some of you guys mentality it would be a very boring game. The only people that would win would be the loser top 4.
Good things to come from Stoke in 09 imo. If we complete some of the signings we hope over the next week I can see us establishing ourselves as a mid table team before the end of the season.
Ste
Last edited:

.

I think it means he isn't a United or Liverpool fan.