Acess speed Gigabit Lan

Permabanned
Joined
26 Oct 2002
Posts
1,737
How fast can a hard drive give out info so to speak compared to a gigabit LAN.

Would a 100 Mbit LAN me more than fast enough cater for the max speed of a non SSD Hard drive ?
 
100Mbps LAN = 12.5MB/s (minus overheads)
1Gbps LAN = 125MB/s (minus overheads)

A decent mechanical HDD = 90-100MB/s

Gigabit is the way to go if possible but means buying gigabit switches etc but depending on what you want then 100mbps might be adequate. For example 100mbps is ample for streaming even 720p content from a server to an HTPC.
 
I can give my GigE network a good spank ;)

giga1.jpg


giga2.jpg


HEADRAT
 
Thats pretty nice HEADRAT - on gigabit here we don't often manage to push it much over 400Mbit/s even with core 2 PCs running RAID on each end. Think I might need to play around with the jumbo frame settings.
 
I was gonna say, How do you achieve those speeds headrat?

I have a raid 5 gigabit NAS (Synology CS407) connected to a gigabit switch with Cat6 which is connected to my pc's gigabit network card, also using cat6 (with a raid0 drives), I just tested my speed and the best I could get was 26mb/s transfer speed.

How could I determine my bottleneck?
 
Me too, I was getting 50-70MB/sec when all my PCs were on XP, changed to Vista and now it's half or less. Spent some time ****** around with various setting, disabling Vista 'improvements' mostly, but no real gain and can't get back to 70.
 
I've got you beat there HeadRat, Regularly get over 100MB/s to or from my file server using SMB over Gigabit without any Jumbo Frames (Vista x64 <-> Server 2003 x64)
Can't take a screenshot right now, because a housemate is streaming HD from it.

Biggest things impacting your performance are usually your network cards. Make sure you have either really good onboard in each comp or buy some decent PCI-E NIC's.
Vista is pretty good too, I believe it ramps up the window size automatically on file transfers.

If you google for and download an app called "iperf" you can easily benchmark bandwidth at different TCP window sizes between two comps.
 
The Intel Pro's are good, yes.
I'm using a Broadcom NetXtreme PCI-E (can't remember exact model number i'm afraid) in my server, and a Realtek 8168b onboard in my main comp.

Make sure TCP offloading is enabled in the driver settings.
 
This is just a transfer of a large file between my WHS and my Vista x64 machine, I'm using Intel Pro PCI-E cards in both machines and a Netgear GS105 Gigabit swich.

HEADRAT
 
This is just a transfer of a large file between my WHS and my Vista x64 machine, I'm using Intel Pro PCI-E cards in both machines and a Netgear GS105 Gigabit swich.

HEADRAT


Looks interesting.

My WHS to Vista 32 xfer speeds based on Marvel onboard Gigabit NICs and a GS105 seem to be 5% util with 6MB/s :(

Any tips on Intel Pro PCI-E cards? Is the Intel PRO/1000 GT the one to go for?
 
Last edited:
I have a raid 5 gigabit NAS (Synology CS407) connected to a gigabit switch with Cat6 which is connected to my pc's gigabit network card, also using cat6 (with a raid0 drives), I just tested my speed and the best I could get was 26mb/s transfer speed.

That nas only has a 500mhz cpu and 128mb of ram theres your bottleneck right there. I know Intel do a box with a 1.6Ghz Celeron and 512MB ram running EMC lifeline (or you can install WHS) which will get closer to 48mb/s.
Or you could grow your own system using a fast CPU 1GB ram etc running freenas or openfiler. a lot of nas will soon be coming with Atom and will be a little faster.
 
I was gonna say, How do you achieve those speeds headrat?

I have a raid 5 gigabit NAS (Synology CS407) connected to a gigabit switch with Cat6 which is connected to my pc's gigabit network card, also using cat6 (with a raid0 drives), I just tested my speed and the best I could get was 26mb/s transfer speed.

How could I determine my bottleneck?

How does it compare with the quoted speeds from Synology?

http://www.synology.com/enu/products/CS407/perf.php

I found that enabling jumbo frames on my NAS ( DS207+) and my PCs increased performance. I now pretty much hit the quoted figures for the 207+ spot on.

Andy.
 
I did the research on this before I re-built my file server.

• On NIC's

Go with PCI Express cards if you are using an existing MB, make sure they are good cards, like Intel, and not cheap ones. I recommend the high end Intel cards, they have their own cpu and give you much faster speeds. Intel's Server models are the best in my opinion.
PCI Gigabit cards are nice but are limited to the available bandwidth of the PCI bus plus a whole bunch of other things. I's stay away from PCI cards.
For onboard NIC's make sure its connected to the PCI Express bus and not the PCI bus.
Most Gigabit Realtek onboard NIC's rarely go over 20MB/s, most stay around the 6-7MB/s range. I'd purchase a different card if you have a Realtek NIC.

• On NAS

After doing some research on NAS, I decided to just build a RAID array instead. Most NAS use LAN chipsets that can limit your transfers to around 6-12MB/s. Although several models are available that offer speeds closer to the Gigabit standard, their cost was not worth it to me.

• On Hard Drives

Most modern hard drives can support 40-80MB/s over Gigabit LAN. It all depends on your IE/SATA & NIC chipset. I have single drives that can pull over 80MB/s over my network. You can use software like HDTune to check your drives speed, there are other tools as well under Linux.
As for solid state drives, the cost is not worth it right now. 4 drives in a RAID array will giver you more bang for your buck at this time.

• Best Option (In my opinion)

I use a High Point 2640x4 PCI-E raid card with 4x1TB Samsung F1 drives and can max out the Marvell 88E8056 onboard NIC's on a low end Intel dual core system with 4gb ram.
I also use a HP Procurve 1800-8G gigabit switch. Don't bother with a low end hub/switch if you are streaming large files as they can bottleneck your network. HP makes less expensive models than the 1800-8G, just make sure its a FULL gigabit switch. I've used Netgear, D-Link, along with other brands and none have worked as well as the HP has.

• In the end....

I'd weigh over the cost's of a NAS vs a RAID setup. If you have a spare computer you can set up as a server, personally I'd so with a RAID over a NAS. With Linux you can set up a low cost storage server with Samba or do what a friend of mine does and just share out the drive over the network with a XP machine.

Just remember..

To achieve gigabit speeds with a storage solution NAS/RAID you need to examine your entire network.
Check your NIC's in all machines, make sure they are capable of the desired speeds.
Check all hard drives, a slow hard drive will result in slow speeds.
Check your Hub/Switch, it might not have the right circutry for large transfers.
Make sure long runs of cable are Cat5e/Cat6

Best of luck...
 
Back
Top Bottom