Poll: *Uefa Champions League Semi-final*- **Spoilers**

Who will qualify?

  • Man.U. & Barcelona

    Votes: 141 56.0%

  • Man.U. & Chelsea

    Votes: 71 28.2%

  • Arsenal & Barcelona

    Votes: 28 11.1%

  • Arsenal & Chelsea

    Votes: 12 4.8%
  • Total voters
    252
14ui442.jpg
 
Tummy said:
You didn't take your chances though did you ?
Drogba over two legs could have scored 2/3 goals.

Arsenal try to walk the ball into the net ? so what ? Barca play good football.
Barca had the control of the ball, they passed you off the pitch.

How many GOOD chances over two legs did they're possession create ?

Chelski had chances to put the game to bed, yeh Chelski should have had a pen or 2, but maybe you wouldn't be so bitter if Drogba scored.
Click to expand...

Woah, woah, woah. Who are YOU? Do you know who I support? No, obviously not.
 
I love the gif for so many reasons. Hiddink is doing one of those family camcorder moments of pretending there isn't a camera there at all.
 
Viper² said:
Iniesta was a yellow card away from a suspension and didn't get booked for taking his shirt off. More controversy?
Click to expand...

That was a disgrace, I didn't realise he only needed one more yellow to get a suspension.

I'm not sure how any barcelona fan could be celebrating the fact they got into the final and this is coming from a United fan
 
Pique's handball was a pen, no question.

However people have short memories. Last week barca should have had a pen and ballack should have been sent off, and tonights red wasn't even a foul.

Chelsea defended brilliantly over the two legs and would have been worthy finalists. However when a team doesn't score away, and doesn't even try to get one, you always risk getting hit by a sucker punch at home. Lets hope UTD turn up to play football and we should have a great final.
 
According to BBC Iniesta wasn't on a yellow so wouldn't have missed the final for taking his shirt off why do people think he was on a yellow?
 
Gilly said:
Chelsea didn't offer much football in the first game, but limited Barca, which was the plan.

Barca had one single shot on target in the second leg...
Click to expand...

They only needed one goal though Gilly ;)

one shot, one goal ;)

Ref was poor, however doesn't cover up the fact Chelski didn't score, didn't play well enough over two legs. A team that cost 500 million can't go to another club and actually play football.
 
Tummy said:
They only needed one goal though Gilly ;)

one shot, one goal ;)

Ref was poor, however doesn't cover up the fact Chelski didn't score, didn't play well enough over two legs. A team that cost 500 million can't go to another club and actually play football.
Click to expand...

Chelsea got their tactics spot on.

Chelsea contained Barcelona for 181 minutes, that's one hell of a performance from any team.

They were denied 4 stone wall penalties that would have made any miss by Drogba or any last minute goal by Barca irrelevant.

On a side note good interview by Hiddink, he looked really emotional and held back well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom