Man of Honour
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2004
- Posts
- 25,821
- Location
- Glasgow
A Scot who doesn't think that his fellow countrymen are capable of running their own affairs, doesn't think we can survive without the aid of another country, doesn't see that we have been downtrodden for many generations and doesn't have the nerve to vote to free his country is a traitor to everything our ancestors fought and strived for - a free and independent country.
Do you think the World is the same as it was in our ancestors day? Do we face the same pressures, are all our goals the same? Should they necessarily remain the same irrespective of the change that has occurred in the World? Are we oppressed and subjugated?
If you think that the answer to all those questions is "yes" then I'd probably agree you have a point, if the answer to any of those questions is "no" then your claim is somewhat more dubious.
It really is not interfering. It is quite the opposite, it is letting the market decide.
It is interference in the sense that the market had a level (with the nationalised industries) and that was changed by the Government of the day, they put a metaphorical spoke in the wheel and that changed the market. If you want to argue about whether they should have had to or whether the market should have contained nationalised industries in the first place then that is a bit of a different argument.
Labour ain't perfect by a long shot but atleast they are human.
If "to err is human..." then I'd have to grant you that our current crop of politicians almost all seem very human indeed.