Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 8,725
- Location
- UK
700+ voters is a pretty substantial number, I think.
The all encompassing BNP thread - keep all crap in here.
- Thread starter Stolly
- Start date
When the particular poster in question is owner of the forums then it adds weight to the perceived alignment of this place.
I don't view OcUK as far right, but it's a safe bet saying the membership is certainly more right wing than anything else on average.
I don't view OcUK as far right, but it's a safe bet saying the membership is certainly more right wing than anything else on average.
Yes it says it's a party which stands up for indigenous Britons, and thank god they do because someone has to
Well, that rules out most if not all of the population of England and Scotland, and quite a bit of the population of Wales.
If you were telling the truth, your ideal for Great Britain would be a population of a couple of million people, presumably each with a very large estate of decaying ghost towns. Hopefully decaying quickly, because they'd probably have to revert to an agrarian lifestyle as there wouldn't be enough of them to maintain a society with current levels of industrialisation, urbanisation and technology.
You're not telling the truth, are you?
The Roman occupation, obviously, since that's where the term "Briton" comes from.
So as a member you must share his percieved views, crap analogy.
Being right wing has nothing to do with my questions about why this forum is labelled as having BNP undertones, duh.
To quote one of DD's favourite rebuttals, that is a non sequitur.
It wasn't an analogy, merely an example of the owners views on race. Surprisingly someone who is respected and is looked up to who then offers opinions like that is going to affect opinions of posters who look up to him.
Although 750~ members is a small sample (how many posters are regular contributors?) and 10% result in favour of the BNP is way above that of the general population.
I don't read here enough to form an opinion if there are definite BNP undertones, but certain posters are quite vocal about their affiliations with said party. Casual glances will form opinions of this forum from just a few posts, be that correct or not who is to say.
The BNP and their ideas are a very current and important subject for debate, and I hope to see some further discussion.
I can answer that quite easily.. Spie has posted a link from a white supremacist site before. Namely the flash animation of "Go west" that depicted the country being overrun by eastern (asian) immigrants, and the white population migrating to America (in a deliciously ironic move) accompanied by the words "so true."
Not to mention the several members that openly admit to attending BNP meetings (and agreeing with policy.)
bloody romans..what have they ever done for us!
on the flip side I am pretty sure my ancestors hark back to vikings ( a fair few on the east coast probably are as a lot of immigrants populated it when it was the Danelaw)...If I'm not an indigenous Briton and can be deported...are danish women hot?
Anywhere you like, they normally do
I think I'll wait until they kick just about everybody out & then I'll claim some land in the name of all that is *****.
Too True.
Anywhere you like, they normally do
Well if you belive Wiki then gypsies=Romani people which came from medieval India
Just don't leave us your rubbish please
Who cares, just **** off!
See the Blacks, Asians & Arabs have PC protection but us Gyps just have to take abuse, Constantly moved on, Accused of thieving when we are just recycling your metal into goods etc We even slave away on your drives for 45 minutes only for you to moan that your car sinks.
You lot just don't appreciate what the average Gyp does for England !!!
***** !!!
You would class as indigenous by the BNP's definition. But as for deporting people, the only people who would have to fear involuntary deporation would be illegal immigrants and immigrant criminals (who we currently can't deport).