I watch a lot of midfielders and Carrick has very, very rarely struck me as being world class, if ever. I would say that he had a good season last season and the Man Utd fans did the same as they did with Anderson, started over rating him. Man Utd were good last season, they worked, subsequently a few players were better than they might be again for a while (Carrick especially). He's good, but he isn't on Fabregas' level and I'm not even sure Fab is at world class yet, so Carrick definitely isn't, regardless of the 'he plays really deep and doesn't really do loads but nobody else plays there' excuse, as Alonso is considerably better at what Carrick does and more imo.
Edit - Don't get me wrong I fully appreciate what he does, he's a fantastic passer of the ball who obviously has a good understanding of football and has played well in some big games, he just isn't effective, or quite good enough to be considered amongst the very best.
lol, not sure Fab's world class, he WAS the player of the tournement in Euro 2008, a silly number of assists, ran the best offence in the world, came on and changed each and every game and the games he started he was brilliant. He was so good that it was Fabregas that was double man marked in the final, not anyone else, it was the incredibly close attention paid to Fabregas that allowed Xavi/Silva and others the space to be effective in the final, even then Fabregas was very good. FOr everyone wetting themselves over Iniesta this year, whose been as good for 3 years, he started games in the Euro's, spain got nowhere, Fabregas came on and the goals went in, he was without question far more effective with his passing and movement than Iniesta. The difference in team football is the Barca team is just stupidly stronger with Eto'o infront of them instead of Adebayor. Fabregas is so good he even got the useless Adebayor to 30 goals.
Carricks also very good, but horrible defensively, partially down to complete lack of pace, his game isn't running or chasing, but picking out the right pass with the ball, he's not got Fabregas's ability to turn away from trouble that offsets Fab's possible lack of size and lack of real pace. But Carrick is very very good at picking out defence splitting passes. However, he has to be the most fowards of the two midfielders and with Anderson he's not, when he was played with Scholes almost all year long Scholes took up the more withdrawn position and Carrick stepped forward. Even in the CL final this was apparent, to the very second Scholes came on Carrick was suddenly staying put 10-20 yards inside the Barca half when they had the ball, while with ANderson on he was at the halfway line or deeper most of the time.
I have no idea how people are saying, "you can't compare him to xxx, they play in completely different positions", wtf, firstly they don't, he's an attacking central mid whose been forced back at points this year and since Utd don't have a real DM. He's always been a AMC and will always be a AMC, there are dozens, if not hundreds of top quality players that play his position, largely because midfield has more top players than any other position in the world. He's very good, not being as good as Fabregas, Iniesta or Gerrard doesn't make him crap, just literally not as good.
Utd HAVE to have a quality DM to play alongside him though as he's frankly, crap at the defensive role.