Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 58,017
- Location
- Blurton
Jeez. What an alarmist the OP is. Kick back, invite some friends round, have a beer and chill!!![]()
If you knew the OP you would know that was a massive understatement.
Jeez. What an alarmist the OP is. Kick back, invite some friends round, have a beer and chill!!![]()
Cause it's done such a good job so far?![]()
Indeed, somehow these novice pilots were able to pull off manoeuvres that many veteran military and commercial pilots have stated would be difficult or impossible to achieve even by the most skilled pilots.
Somehow these Saudis with box cutters were able to get NORAD to suspend its normal air defence system whereby fighters would be automatically scrambled to intercept jets with any sort of problem, like happened with Payne Stewart's learjet.
THAT is the conspiracy theory that YOU and others believe. I agree, it is a very unbelievable conspiracy theory. Why do so many believe it then? I suppose because to believe the US government could have had any kind of foreknowledge or complicity in the 9/11 attacks, that they could have instigated them, or facilitated their being carried out in any way at all, is too horrible to contemplate.
There's only one God, just known by different names depending upon which culture you are from.
Personally, I'm undecided.
People commonly misuse the term, that isn't my fault. I am using it correctly.Ah, I see. You're taking an uncommon definition of conspiracy theory, strictly correct in that there was a conspiracy to crash the planes but not what is understood by the term conspiracy theory in common parlance.
Don't quite get your point? Good job with what?
Are you one of those who believes because there is suffering in the world there can't be a God?
There is only science
by your statement.There is only science
Are you saying science and religion contradict eachother? I believe both go hand in hand.Don't quite get your point? Good job with what?
Are you one of those who believes because there is suffering in the world there can't be a God?
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
perhaps 30-40 years before we see a China with the ability to project a strong and capable military worldwide...
Will they want to though?
They seem pretty content with their own corner of the globe rather than running around sticking their military oar in
As the old quote goes
God does things on his own timescale. The Bible makes it clear that he'll get round to sorting all this mess out when he's good and ready.

God does things on his own timescale. The Bible makes it clear that he'll get round to sorting all this mess out when he's good and ready.
Means there can not be a benevolent god, merely a child with an ant farm and a magnifying glass.
As the old quote goes...
Yes, probably by killing us all. What a *******.
I'm very much an atheist; I see no evidence of god - quite the contrary to be honest. I don't even see any evidence of karma or any kind of natural order/balance in peoples actions and consequences. So the concept of an all seeing, all powerful being who just sits there and lets children be raped and killed, or samaritans be beheaded, is frankly, laughable.
There is no god, there is nothing more than what we do here, and that is it.
All IMHO, and [honestly] no offense intended to those who do believe in something more.
)
There's a huge difference between a self-fulfilling prophecy and an actual prophecy you know. If a lot of people believe something is supposed to happen, a lot of people are going to be going out of their way to make it happen aren't they? There is no God involved here; only stupid squabbling monkeys who want validating, that's it!
back and how about you make it clear what on earth you are replying too? Who said there isn't a difference between a self fulfilling prophecy and an actual one? I sure as hell didn't. 