with full AA it still got the same result for some reason.Is that with full AA?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
with full AA it still got the same result for some reason.Is that with full AA?
it seems like the 5850 is slower than 2 4850..
on Resident Evil 5 i got 92.4 FPS at 1920x1200 DX10 , FIXED, with 2 4850
same settings with a 5850 only gets 78.5 FPS..
i'm really hoping its the drivers.
nope, on screens display isn't on.Make sure you don't have that MSI afterburner on screens display on, kills FPS.
Yeah 58's love lots of AA, I bet your 4850's couldn't keep up with full AA.
on the FIXED benchmark??That seems a little low to me since most of the 5870's i have seen are getting around 120 average fps, i don't think the 5850 should be that much slower.

I did try MSI afterburner didn't work though![]()
Did you use 'Afterburner v.1.1.0 (2009-10-05)'?
They added the 5850 support two days ago.
I know the HIS 5850 can overclock well because I have seen it on a techpowerup review, they didn't say how they did it unfortunatelyWhat drivers are you guys using ? the only ones that work for me are the ones that came on the Sapphire disc, if i use the ones off the ati site or the leaked beta's my games just crash after a few seconds.
Has anybody tried Crysis or Warhead at sensible settings?
Say 1680 x 1050, 2x AA and a mix of medium to high settings?

Has anybody tried Crysis or Warhead at sensible settings?
Say 1680 x 1050, 2x AA and a mix of medium to high settings?




