The all encompassing BNP thread - keep all crap in here.

Apparently this chump Griffin is doing some sort of fund-raiser in a hotel about 2 mins away from me tonight.

There was a party of fox-hunters at the same hotel last year and they got some serious abuse from a load of demonstrator types. I dread to think what they have got in store for this dude.

Should be fun to watch anywho - I'll let you know if any claret gets spilled!
 
If it's anything like the time they attempted to hold some convention at a hotel near me in Altrincham (southern Manchester), it'll be quite funny :)
 
David Duke: Nick Griffin was 'lynched' on Question Time


The former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke said on Friday that Nick Griffin was "lynched" on Question Time, echoing the BNP leader's own verdict on his treatment on the programme.


David Dimbleby confronted Mr Griffin on the programme with evidence that he had shared a platform with Mr Duke, who founded a Klan chapter called the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan in 1974.

Speaking from his home in Louisiana, Mr Duke told The Daily Telegraph he left the Klan in 1980 because he disliked its associations with violence and could not stop the members of other Klan chapters from doing "stupid or violent things".

Mr Duke, who lives in Louisiana and is still a prominent white supremacist figure around the world, said he was doubtful whether Mr Griffin's appearance on Question Time advanced his cause.

"I cannot see how that programme, with the terrible drubbing he took, helped his cause," he said. "If I'd been on the the show, I'd have got out of my chair and said, 'Is this a lynching or an interview programme?'" He said he had met Mr Griffin a "few times" at gatherings and had spoken to him, all told, for no more than an hour. "We're not close friends," he added.

As Mr Griffin said on Question Time, Mr Duke insisted he had never espoused violence. He dismissed a conviction he received in 1979 for inciting a riot at a Klan gathering in New Orleans as a "scuffle" after the police tried to shut down the meeting.

"When I speak to any groups around the world I say specifically that violence where innocent people are harmed is not only counter-productive but it's also deeply, morally wrong," he said.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ick-Griffin-was-lynched-on-Question-Time.html
 
A prominent member of KKK talking about NG getting lynched... it's almost like hearing Kim Jong Il saying how the Western countries bullied Saddam Hussein.
 
A prominent member of KKK

Until 29 years ago when he left because he was against violence but that fact was oddly left out of Dimbleby's attack on Thursday night.

Oh and off topic but the Western countries did bully Saddam Hussein and ended up murdering him because he wanted to sell oil in euros rather than the dollar, but back on topic...
 
Extremism always comes into it's own when the 'man in the street' feels that his views aren't being addressed by the mainstream political parties.

It bears remembering that it was the resentment caused by the Treaty of Versailles and the enormous amounts of reparation forced upon the German people after World War 1 that played right into Hitler's hands. He used that resentment to foster support for a party that most German people would not have voted for normally.

The mainstream political parties need to take note of that and do something about it because, unfortunately, there a lot of people in Britain that will vote on one issue and don't give a damn about fiscal policy or anything else - especially if the issue is emotive enough.
 
Using the word "lynched" here throughout is completely offensive to people who were lynched or the target of lynching.

If its being done out of hyperbole, then people aren't exactly being objective.
 
Until 29 years ago when he left because he was against violence but that fact was oddly left out of Dimbleby's attack on Thursday night.

Oh and off topic but the Western countries did bully Saddam Hussein and ended up murdering him because he wanted to sell oil in euros rather than the dollar, but back on topic...

Do you write for the daily mail?
 
The BBC encouraged the crowd to ask provocative questions and to boo Griffin...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-stage-managing-Question-Time-onslaught.html

Shame they couldn't use their magnificent powers of coercion to make Griffin answer questions openly and honestly...

I'd also query whether they 'encouraged' or 'ensured' that people could be free to ask provocative questions and to make their feelings known, or actually demanded they asked provocative questions (which is a different issue entirely) Given the controversy, it may have been entirely acceptable to ensure that the audience knew they could ask the questions that they wanted and to make their feelings clear...
 
Last edited:
Shame they couldn't use their magnificent powers of coercion to make Griffin answer questions openly and honestly...
...


Oh..do you mean like that tory women who did not answer if she hates gays? even though we all know she does...
 
Shame they couldn't use their magnificent powers of coercion to make Griffin answer questions openly and honestly...

I'd also query whether they 'encouraged' or 'ensured' that people could be free to ask provocative questions

'Your question SHOULD ... be provocative'. Not 'it can be provocative if you like'.

article-1222586-06F13A88000005DC-789_468x253.jpg
 
'Your question SHOULD ... be provocative'. Not 'it can be provocative if you like'.

article-1222586-06F13A88000005DC-789_468x253.jpg

Is that non-standard for question time? After all it would be rather boring if the audience asked questions that were boring, mundane and commonly agreed.

Were the questions only for Nick Griffin?
 
Back
Top Bottom