Here's the thing: It's not a general-purpose computer. It's not a Mac. They did this really subtle thing to tell you that: they didn't put "Mac" in the name anywhere. If it had been the MacPad, then maybe some of these complaints would be perfectly valid. Maybe expecting it to act a certain way would be appropriate.
But it's not a Mac. It's a new consumer device. It's targeted at people who do e-mail, surf the web a little, play a few games, watch some movies, and listen to music. It's not a replacement for a computer if you do more than that on your computer. But most people don't. We geeks are the minority on that point, and for many people, a regular computer is both overkill and frustrating. The iPad is not a tablet computer in the sense that Windows tablets are. But what it is, is all that the vast majority of people will ever want out of a computer, and it fits in a briefcase, purse, or backpack and weighs less than two pounds.
I think naysayers should read the article this text links too. It's spot on.
Heres a little extract though, and it sums up my feelings and thoughts in a better way than I could have done.
Relating to those people wanting feature "x" or feature "y"
Both the iPhone and iPad are using the same codebase. Any improvements to the general OS will undoubtly end up on both devices.
How long did it take us to get Copy and Paste? OS-frickin-3. They wanted to get copy and paste right (for touch input) before giving it to us; getting it wrong could have had some bad consequences for the user. We may have to wait to get it, but boy did they it right...
...For all we know they are currently working hard on iPhone OS 4.0 and some great new features to build into. Think multitasking, new notifications, new homescreen etc. My bet is bet they aren't quite ready for prime-time yet but apple wanted to get the iPad out there. There's a reason that the iPad is only running OS 3.2; it doesn't have many new features on top of 3.1.
If and when we see the next iPhone OS I have no doubt the major new features will be implemented onto both the iPhone AND the iPad.
As a further aside: The first gen iphone runs OS 3 right? I'd bet on the iPad being able to run iPhone OS 6.0.
Perhaps blasphemy posting this here.
This was the CES product shown. Unlike the iphone, the ipad won't go unchallenged. Dell, Lenovo will also release products and probably others.
Very few details though.
What's the point of composing an email when there's no spell checker?
What's with the micro SIM format? Is it just a way to limit consumer choice of networks?
http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/27/apple-ipads-micro-sim-explained/ said:While the news of Apple's iPad having 3G wasn't exactly a surprise, the move to a new format for the SIM certainly was. The SIM -- that tiny card that holds your contact info and account information that you find in your GSM handset -- is a 15 x 25mm plastic card whereas the new Micro SIM (also known as a 3FF SIM) is a diminutive 12 x 15mm, about 52% smaller. Needless to say, it's not physically compatible with your current phone. This card was developed by the ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute) to offer things like more storage space on-chip for provider applications, increased control and security functions -- over what, we don't know -- and the new smaller form factor allows it to fit in tiny devices. Frankly, we wouldn't call the iPad "tiny" and we have absolutely no clue what justification Apple had to switch to it other than a desire to be different -- this is the company that pioneered Mini DisplayPort, after all -- but the long and the short of it is that you're going to have a hard time finding a carrier offering Micro SIMs in the short term since the GSMA doesn't appear to be actively spearheading a mass conversion. In fact, from AT&T's perspective, this is better than a software lock in some ways -- you're not going to be able to download a hack that gets you on another network, so you're totally at the mercy of your carrier at choice for providing a compatible card. Intentionally evil? Perhaps not -- all standards have to start somewhere -- but it's an awful pain in the ass.
Update: T-Mobile (in a partnership with Lok8u GPS devices) announced they were bringing the 3FF SIM to US shores back on January 6th of this year. See the source link for more info.
PS> And what a heck with 3G model costing 130 bucks more? What is radio chip made of, gold?
Internet on it sucks big time due to no flash. Ouuuu, that looks like a fan video! On no, wait, you cant watch it. Instead you have to quit safari, go to home screen, fire up youtube app, search for this video, watch it, close youtube app, fire up safari again to continue browsing. Truly "pretty amazing".
100% so you cant just stick your existing USIM, without using an Apple accredited network plan. Very subtle way, for now, to restrict what users can do with it until normal phones start using the same SIM format - which I dont think they ever will (whats wrong with USIM currently?)What's with the micro SIM format? Is it just a way to limit consumer choice of networks?
100% so you cant just stick your existing USIM, without using an Apple accredited network plan. Very subtle way, for now, to restrict what users can do with it until normal phones start using the same SIM format - which I dont think they ever will (whats wrong with USIM currently?)
In other news I dno if Im buying a MBP until the refresh (whenever that happens)
ps3ud0![]()