To those who dislike UK "immigrants"

Status
Not open for further replies.
So,, what are you against? If Sharia Law did take over, that would be colonization - would you be for that?
Controlled immigration that benefits the state = good.

Massive uncontrolled immigration with whole areas being rapidly taken over by specific races (colonization) = bad.
 
Interesting survey:

http://www.muslimwestfacts.com/mwf/118249/Gallup-Coexist-Index-2009.aspx

Particularly

loyal.jpg


Which I guess shows how much influence the Daily Fail et al has on public perceptions.

That's a very interesting piece of research. The bit at the end on morally justifiable violence is particularly disturbing.
 
And I don't mind British nationals who pay taxes, have jobs, don't steal, aren't egotistical, don't enforce religious viewpoints, and speak and write English to an appropriate standard.

The latter point seems to be a common failure of many "Indigenous White Britons". As an example, your post has at least 15 basic English mistakes alone. Most foreigners I know make far less basic mistakes. I suggest before you preach about the language abilities of others, you take some lessons yourself.


I don't care about driving licenses unless they drive.

C-C-C-C-C-C-Combo Breaker!!! :D
 
I agree. I don't think I could move to India or the Pakistan (for example) and expect them to make exceptions for me. Its their way or the highway everywhere else.
You have literally no idea of how ex-pats live across the globe. I think there's only the Irish who feel the need to be somewhere home away from home more than the average brit. In countries and states where alcohol is illegal there are whole british-led subcultures running pubs and bars.

On a similar note,what about all these Mosks and arabic specific schools ? if british people moved to Iran etc would they pay to build structures specific to our religions?
They wouldn't pay no, but I'm unaware that I've paid for anything specifically for any religion let alone a "non-british" one. They would be free to build whatever they wished though

The British are hugely hypocritical when it comes to integration within a foreign culture. The British expats in Spain are a good example of this. I do think integration is important, but how can we expect others to do it if we can't?
can't believe it took this long into the thread for someone to point this out. We as a nation are absolutely terrible at it.

Yes of course I have, and I'm telling you from my experience white families are typically smaller, there is noway we compete with them, back in 2001 ethnic birth rates were estimated to be 15 times the rate of the white population, 15 times, I dread to think what it is now.
And you realise how insignificant that is when you take into account the population division?
 
Actually we did, the US took loads of German immigrants during WWII.

Also, you'd be hard pressed to blame the Afghan/Iraqi public for us going to war on them, I'd understand it if they wanted out, after all we've practically destroyed large parts of their country for them
 
Controlled immigration that benefits the state = good.

Massive uncontrolled immigration with whole areas being rapidly taken over by specific races (colonization) = bad.

So, what the UK has practiced over the last 300 years is bad (colonisation), but immigration which is benefiting the state, as is currently happening in the UK is good.
 
So, what the UK has practiced over the last 300 years is bad (colonisation), but immigration which is benefiting the state, as is currently happening in the UK is good.
What many countries have practised over 1000's of years is bad. One of the worst examples of colonization is the tragedy that affected the North American Indian.

Whilst the UK has had some benefit from immigration in recent years there is no doubt that it hasn't been anywhere near tightly controlled enough. This by the governments own admission was a mistake and the policy is being reversed. Public services are at breaking point under the strain. It was a very badly thought out policy.
 
There's a difference between immigration and colonization.

Some UK Muslims may want Sharia, and I am happy for them to have the choice to deal with certain issues like the Jews have in this country.

There are also UK Muslims that actually like secular democracy, http://www.bmsd.org.uk/, though I'm guessing they won't get nearly as much coverage as the Islam4UK idiots.
 
Some UK Muslims may want Sharia, and I am happy for them to have the choice to deal with certain issues like the Jews have in this country.

There are also UK Muslims that actually like secular democracy, http://www.bmsd.org.uk/, though I'm guessing they won't get nearly as much coverage as the Islam4UK idiots.

It really is a shame that Turkey turned it's back on a secular government.
 
I would be fascinated to see your 8000 year old family trees, you know from back when the UK became separated from Europe.

I mean if you don't have your family history back that far then it stands to reason your ancestors very likely moved here (heck they might have invaded the country).

Now I am proud to be British, but do you guys actually understand what that even means?

Does your family own a corner shop?

Just trying to work out your motivation for posting...
 
i just get sad when i see crime watch and 90% are called umbadwah lumpad doo pa! do u get me?
 
In what way? Niqabs are even banned for people who hold public positions.

Exactly. Banning religious dress is as non-secular as mandating it, unless it is part of widespread secular legislation to deal with a non-religious issue that catches the religious aspect as a side effect.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom