Cracked head? I need some manpoints for this. :D

Honda engines were in the 600s (1.8, 2.0 NASP and 2.3) and in the older Rover 200/400 etc, due to the breakup with Honda before BMW took over in circa 2000, none were used after that.

In fact, Honda liked the Rover diesel unit so much they used it in the Civic. :)

Honda engines in pre 96 800's too: 825/827mk1's and 827 mk2's
 
surely running 1 ZS 180 (Not that id even bother!) is cheaper than running a 620ti and a ZStd? Even if it does 15mpg less,

Id get shot of both and get something decent tbh, Or get a proper cheap to run banger (That don't break!) and something actual fun for the weekend.

Crazy rover lover
 
surely running 1 ZS 180 (Not that id even bother!) is cheaper than running a 620ti and a ZStd? Even if it does 15mpg less,

Id get shot of both and get something decent tbh, Or get a proper cheap to run banger (That don't break!) and something actual fun for the weekend.

It's like talking to a brick wall, it really is. Mat is very set in his ways :p
 
[TW]Fox;16168476 said:
How would you even know if you've never driven anything but old Rovers? It's not a good drive at all, not with that awful engine in the front of it!

I have driven other cars you know, the usual stuff :)

I just liked the fact the ZS was cheap, was familiar with the engine and it's not a bad drive... 150odd bhp with 250lb/ft does make it stand out from other sub-£2k rides.

I'm not the massive fanboi you all make me out to be you know, for now they do the job but I won't have them all my life. :p
 
I just liked the fact the ZS was cheap, was familiar with the engine and it's not a bad drive... 150odd bhp with 250lb/ft does make it stand out from other sub-£2k rides.

I've bought cars with 300BHP and 300ft.lb for 500 quid, so .....on that basis it's not great either :D

In fact pretty much everything I've bought in the past year has been 150-300BHP and 200-300ft.lb and all under 2k so.......you've no excuse! :D
 
Back
Top Bottom