-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Cinebench 10 i7 V X6
- Thread starter easyrider
- Start date
no worries
Thats interesting though big gains having the two extra cores
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 7,614
- Location
- London
only i7's and x6's ?
Yes, sit and watch by the side lines as the big boys come out and play....
The key metric is 'multiprocessor speed up' and the x6 is hating this bench by the look of it.
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
they are, they are basically losing a core for whatever reason
Would'nt it be more fare to pit a X6 vs an intel hex core without HT on, so its 6cores vs 6cores, both at a set clock.
Would'nt that find out wich is better clock for clock for rendering.
At the mometn its X6 vs, I7's with HT on, so either 8 or 12 threads. So i say try it without HT on, yes i know thats why we get I7's for, but it might be worth seeing the results though.
Would'nt that find out wich is better clock for clock for rendering.
At the mometn its X6 vs, I7's with HT on, so either 8 or 12 threads. So i say try it without HT on, yes i know thats why we get I7's for, but it might be worth seeing the results though.
you realise the 6 core i7 costs 3x+ as much as a x6 right? and they arent even suposed to be in direct competition while a 1090 and a i7 920/930 are.
i'd like someone to play with there memory speed i suspect cinebench is quite reliant on memory bandwidth.
why are we doing this anyway when the x264/handbrake thread got closed after amd were faster? third time lucky?
i'd like someone to play with there memory speed i suspect cinebench is quite reliant on memory bandwidth.
why are we doing this anyway when the x264/handbrake thread got closed after amd were faster? third time lucky?
maybe the way in which their turbo mode works if it is on ?
doesn't that speed up 3 cores and lower the other 3 or something ?
hence the fact that in the single threaded test turbo mode is kicking in but in the multi threaded test it isn't and lowering the multiprocessor speed up score ?
Last edited:
*cough* - TRY 11.5 instead of using old dodgy software
R10 don't even detect the mhz properly let alone owt else!
Yes i do realise its 3x the cost.
But would'nt it prove once and for all which is better intel or amd for rendering when its equal clock speed and cores. No matter what the cost, we all know intel are far more costly then amd, thats a given. But is'nt it about time someone did a proper test to see if that cost is justified.
Pointless comparing them when ones 6 cores and the other is 4 with 8 threads, bit uneven don't u think.
Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Aug 2003
- Posts
- 20,160
- Location
- Woburn Sand Dunes
oh_OH the gaps even closer......
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 7,614
- Location
- London
Looks photo shopped tbh
No seriously, a big thanks to Gareth but we could do with more results from the AMD stable - maybe Big.Wayne could put his money where his .... Ah never mind
its not photoshopped or edited in any well. also my system is 100% stable..Looks photo shopped tbh
No seriously, a big thanks to Gareth but we could do with more results from the AMD stable - maybe Big.Wayne could put his money where his .... Ah never mind
anyway heres r11
Last edited: