How to take stunning pictures - channel 5 tv series

I must admit i kinda agree, composition is obviously highly important, but it seems like they just leave the camera on auto, which with good lighting and composition can make a good picture, but not an amazing one.
 
I must admit i kinda agree, composition is obviously highly important, but it seems like they just leave the camera on auto, which with good lighting and composition can make a good picture, but not an amazing one.

and certainly not a 'stunning' one :p
 
I'm just watching last nights episode on catchup, am I right In thinking I heard the girl who is one of the wannabe photographers only bought a camera at Christmas.... And she's shooting her sisters wedding, AND she's matron of honour at the same wedding???? How the hell's that going to work? When's she going to take any shots?
 
The show is pretty rubbish imo. I'm an utter n00b, i don't have a DSLR, i've never taken a picture with one and the little I do know was picked up from forums and articles. I seriously could have put together a better show then this. Excluding the natural light tips from last weeks episode nothing they've mentioned has been too useful.
 
ooh I feel so inspired! lol

The highlight of the show was the tutor John Locke.. I thought he became the smoke monster?!?!

hahaha.

I mean the image of the feet looking down I said instantly thats a lovely image but not a landscape image.

To mention filters and not elaborate on them....
 
I think possibly everyone's expecting a little too much from the show, certainly in the timeframe they have for giving info out.
It's what, 23 minutes long? Less intro, outro, etc, you've got about 20 minutes to explain a key area. I'm assuming the amateur's spend all day with the pro, and so learn about what we expect to hear in the program.

It seems to be catering for everyone also, not just SLR or advanced cameras which have adjustable aperture and shutter speeds, therefore they have to focus on certain key areas which will be beneficial for everyone, even the person who's just got a P&S and is using it for the first time. What do they want to hear? Choose F16 to get everything in focus, or get that tree in shot it'll make the picture look better?
Unfortunately there's still the vast majority of people out there who still only own basic cameras, so they are targetting the demographic, not the keen amateur.

I have to say though, I was dissapointed with last nights episode more than the others. Even though there was more info in it, I've heard of the pro and admire his work so was hoping for a lot more detail. I felt it rushed and brushed over certain key areas. To me, Landscape photography is more technical than the other topics covered so far, and it fell way short. Would it have been so difficult or time consuming to say shoot in the golden hour, here's a shot taken at midday, here's the same shot at dusk, same location, see the difference? 20 seconds, instant impact and visual explaination so it sinks in.
 
Last edited:
To mention filters and not elaborate on them....

They brought up 'filters' twice without actually saying the words circular polariser or gradated neutral density..I can sort of understand why they did this, but then why bring them up at all? Fair enough not broaching the tech aspects (that can easily be read from an article at leisure), but they're failing to cover the artistic side very well either.
 
Having just started a college course in Photography atm this program is dire i hate the fact they don't tell you what settings the so called newbies are using.

The latest one 28th - Landscapes the only thing that i thought was good was the card viewfinder to capture the image. Which i might have to get one :D
& Agree about the filters they could have gone into more detail.

but i guess its all on the website.
 
Hmm My experience of Photography Courses left very little to be desired, perhaps it's different at various colleged/unis but down here I actually left the course it was that bad and went off to gain my own experience and get stuck in there!
 
hugely hugely disappointed with this.

Had this had an hour slot it could have been so much better.

They showed an example of their previous work, where one part was correctly exposed, and the other part was over exposed.

"You can help resolve this using filters"

WHICH ONES !!!!

And one of the tips at the end was "control your exposure"

HOW ????

Its obvious the two guys spent all day with him and picked up huge ammounts of info, they only have 20 minutes (30 minutes minus a 10 minute ad break) in which to cover everything he said during that day and have the stupid introduction at the beginning, and the judging at the end. Net result, 10 minutes of briefly skipping over very important ports and the only actual advice yet again was about framing your shot.
 
Did anyone really expect a programme on Five, presented by Suzi Perry, to be anything other than hopeless?

She's utterly talentless, knows nothing about any subject she presents, and Five have all the editorial integrity of the Daily Sport.
 
Did anyone really expect a programme on Five, presented by Suzi Perry, to be anything other than hopeless?

She's utterly talentless, knows nothing about any subject she presents, and Five have all the editorial integrity of the Daily Sport.

That's the best description of Suzi Perry I have ever read. I thought I was the only one who thought she was nothing more than a brainless piece of eye candy.

She's so cringeworthy on the tragic show
 
Back
Top Bottom