If you're going to ignore what is quite clearly set out then I'm requesting you don't whinge about it because it's unseemly if nothing else - if someone is going to act tough about their disregard for the law then break down like a sap when their actions catch up with them then I lose respect for that. Disregard the law and take your punishment like a stoic or follow the law and you shouldn't run into any problems.
I think you're confusing whinge with disagree. I don't like it, I don't like it thinking it can decide what's best for me, I don't like it thinking it can decide my fate. Nothing gives it the right to rule over me. It's oppression at it's finest.
It also depends on what you class as completely peaceful, you may well be a risk to other people even if you've got no intention of harming them therefore for their benefit you must be stopped from your actions.
There are many current and past crimes that are peaceful in nature. I'm going to pick one in particular - homosexuality. Government approved 'lawful' sterilisation for that one. There's a fundamental flaw in regulating peaceful activity, and that's people create the regulations. It instantly creates inequality when you enforce them.
You're right, you didn't choose to be born here but perhaps you should move to a place where the law is more conducive to your mindset? Once you've reached the age of majority you have, in effect, acceded to be ruled by the prevailing law in the country as at that point you could move somewhere else which is more to your taste - if you can't find such a place then perhaps it's time to re-examine what or who is the problem here.
I always love it when people go "you should move". How about no? I have every right to be here as much as anyone else. I, however, don't have a right to control the fate of others, and they don't have the right to control mine.
Whether the law as it is implemented today is right, or not, cannot be determined by it's preeminence as the system in operation in most parts of the world. The Earth WAS flat, once.
Because we do require some form of regulation to determine what is and is not permissable - you might be a standup guy who'll never harm another and will always help old ladies across the road but your neighbour, well, he's a bit of a git and thieves while beating up people - do we not need something to deal with him?
Law benefits many, it may benefit some more than others but c'est la vie.
I am all for regulation of non-peaceful activity and enshrining of equality and freedom. I'll admit that 'peaceful' is quite hard to define, but you would be hard pushed to argue that all of our current regulations are 'peace' related. We have many pieces of legislation that are pandering to popular opinion or scaremongering, masquerading as science and necessary controls. This is what I detest.
The law does in fact protect your right to be alive. I'm sure if someone tried to murder you, you'd invoke The Law on them via the Authorities.
The keeping of peace and the law as we have it implemented today are two totally different things.