How on earth is circumcision legal?

lol @ you. I have an insensitive circumcised penis and give more sexual pleasure to the women folk. Thus get food cooked for me and sexual pleasure (eventually). :p

Amen brother.

Got the chop as a baby apparently the little guy was too bug for his jacket so off it came. The ladies have never complained the lass professes to preffering it so meh. Silly arguement is silly.
 
Phimosis is where the skin of four can't stretch over your bicycle helmet.

I had this when I was younger and couldn't get it all the way back.
The Doctor told me to keep playing with it until I could or else I would have it operated on.
I got a lot of practice in :D
 
Fair enough if there's a medical reason for it but forcing a child to do it just because of some religion - a child who might not want it done and a child who is powerless to stop it from being done.

Yeah, I see the question, how on earth is this still legal?
 
I had this when I was younger and couldn't get it all the way back.
The Doctor told me to keep playing with it until I could or else I would have it operated on.
I got a lot of practice in :D

Is "practice" all it takes? I have mild phimosis and have been thinking about getting the chop. If I can avoid all that just by "practising" more, that'd be fantastic.
 
there are no other extraneous bits. what physical purpose does the foreskin serve other than to keep the glans out of contact, which keeps it sensitive.

Earlobes. Completely unneccessary. OK to cut them off?

from what i'm aware of, the more sensitive glans is only of any sort of benefit if you like to come in about 5 seconds when masturbating.

You honestly think that having a foreskin gives you a hair trigger? :confused:

<edit> actually, i've just thought of two others, the Tonsils and the Appendix. no-one would bat an eye if a parent elected to have those removed, even if they didn't need to be at the time.

Really? You think a parent can just go and ask for an appendectomy? Or have tonsils whipped out of their child for no reason? I would be interested to see the surgeon that will do that...

But hey, if you think Gods creation is so flawed that it needs altering, go for it. Why shouldn't you be allowed to mutilate your own kids eh?
 
I don't agree with it when it's done for religious reasons, as it's cruel to do that to a child who doesn't have a say in the matter at that age. I had it done when I was around 6-7, because of either and infection or something that went wrong.
 
Is "practice" all it takes? I have mild phimosis and have been thinking about getting the chop. If I can avoid all that just by "practising" more, that'd be fantastic.

Circumcision is not indicated for phimosis in most cases, steroids or a much less radical Preputioplasty procedure can correct the problem, unfortunately many children have been victims of malpractice and have had circumcision unnecessarily performed for phimosis, which in most cases is just the normal state of the foreskin in childhood.
 
I had mine done last year at the age of 29.

For purely medical reasons - my old fella had never seen the light of day once in the preceding 29 years, and it was getting to the point of affecting my sex life.

Doc had a quick look, muttered something about preventing penile cancer, and that I would benefit from the operation - and two weeks later I was in the hospital having his jacket surgically removed.

To anyone of any age who is the same as I was, and want the procedure done, prepare yourself for a couple of weeks of utter hell after the op. Given he'd been superglued in his jacket for so long, just the slightest touch on anything, even the softest, loosest cotton boxer shorts, gave the weirdest, most uncomfortable and sickening buzz of sensation (and not the nice type!). The wound itself was fine, hardly any pain and the stitched dissolved right on schedule. The organ itself was the problem!

I had to have 3 weeks off work - but once your body gets used to it, then it becomes worth it.
 
Didnt we have this topic come up a few times in the past and its descended into a farce?? ie people on one side saying its cruel, barbaric and mutilation etc etc.

Personally i didnt have mine done but its not affected me in any way, shape or form...just means i have to keep it extra clean with all the gunk that gets underneath the foreskin...but saying that i dont have a full foreskin, its kinda like a half crescent ie only covers the top part but not the bottom part.
 
Back
Top Bottom