Vigilante launching paedophile naming website

The Law is the Law.

Yes it is silly to be put on the same register. It's how this country works. Silly.

But this is a situation that could go horribly wrong as per the website. This over-eager 17 year old ends up on a list where the local community believe him to be as bad as a 40 year old who has raped children, and he ends up getting beaten up or killed.
 
But they are!
The act of paedophillia is having sex with a minor, this theoretical adult has broke that law and has fallen into the category of a peadophile.
There is no real excuse, there is a cut off and that is set at 16, not 15 and 11 months 20 days. It may seem harsh but that's the law.

No. The 'act' of paedophilia is being attracted to prepubescent children. That is it.

Hell, I was physically involved with my 16 year old gf when I was 18, and in SA the age of consent is 18, so technically that makes me a paedophile? Have a word!
 
But this is a situation that could go horribly wrong as per the website. This over-eager 17 year old ends up on a list where the local community believe him to be as bad as a 40 year old who has raped children, and he ends up getting beaten up or killed.

Then it is totally wrong. This website is going to name and shape, but with that will come major uproar/problems, quite possibly as you say, even beatings/killings. People do deserve to know, however.
 
Yeah so I'm a paedophile now apparently. Oh dear. :eek:

There has to be more reasonable thought output towards this. Not one huge list you get stuck on but seperate ones in my opinion.

The media doesn't help really but I can't quite fathom being physically attracted to prepubscent children... Quite horrific and to an extent I feel sorry for the ones who have to put up with but don't want. It's the ones that go out their way to destroy a childs life for their own selfish gain. Wether they know they are or not.
 
The media doesn't help really but I can't quite fathom being physically attracted to prepubscent children... Quite horrific and to an extent I feel sorry for the ones who have to put up with but don't want. It's the ones that go out their way to destroy a childs life for their own selfish gain. Wether they know they are or not.

None of us can imagine it because luckily, I hope, none of us here are afflicted with it. But it must be a form of mental illness. People don't decide to do it because they think it would be fun, or they think they are above the law, etc etc as with most other crimes. They are mentally ill.

For those who suffer from this yet never, ever touch a child it must be absolutely awful.

Those who do touch children are of course no better than rapists - it's one thing to be attracted to something you shouldnt, its entirely another to act on those impulses.
 
[TW]Fox;17724742 said:
I wonder what percentage of peadophiles actually commit acts against children?

I wonder what percentage of normal people who fantasise about normal sex commit rape?

I wonder if these two percentages are the same?

Are there perhaps two types of peadophile?

Maybe we should admit these people to mental care rather than let local people beat them up? They are sick and should be cured.

Assuming the last point isn't referring to the paedophilia side... I totally agree :)
 
Assuming the last point isn't referring to the paedophilia side... I totally agree :)

Once you act, physically, your desires in this way then a harsh prison sentance and nothing less is what is required. But not all of them do. If we could treat or at least try to solve the issues of those who don't touch children but only get found in posession of filthy pictures, maybe we could try and 'cure' the problem?

Nah, lets just let the local meatheads beat them up, innit.
 
No. The 'act' of paedophilia is being attracted to prepubescent children. That is it.

Hell, I was physically involved with my 16 year old gf when I was 18, and in SA the age of consent is 18, so technically that makes me a paedophile? Have a word!


If you was caught and then got a criminal record would that of stopped you having the job you have now have and to be in the UK?
 
Last edited:
I've just checked and there needs to be a 5 year age gap before Teenagers can be classed as peadophile;

14 year old girl, 19 year old male would be classed as a peadophile.
15 year old girl, 19 year old male wouldn't.
 
[TW]Fox;17724915 said:
None of us can imagine it because luckily, I hope, none of us here are afflicted with it. But it must be a form of mental illness. People don't decide to do it because they think it would be fun, or they think they are above the law, etc etc as with most other crimes. They are mentally ill.

For those who suffer from this yet never, ever touch a child it must be absolutely awful.

Those who do touch children are of course no better than rapists - it's one thing to be attracted to something you shouldnt, its entirely another to act on those impulses.

It isn't a choice. People do deem it as a choice unfortunately. Most if not all sexual related preferances aren't a choice. Some people may pretend but they know themselves if they're kidding.

I don't understand how some would feel if they were above the law though. Quite ridiculous if they did.

I would regard it as an illness too, or an affliction. No one would certainly wish that upon themselves.
 
thats quite some number

Quote from Guardian.co.uk .... "On the latest available figures, up to April 2009, there are more than 44,700 people on the sex offenders register for England and Wales."

Dunno where he gets his 180,000 from.
 
Back
Top Bottom