OK. After deciphering that, I would disagree. He knocked over a child, while still banned and left her for dead?
How bad does it need to get?
how do you feel about this? (Hit & Run Asylum Seeker to stay in UK)
- Thread starter cm1179
- Start date
How bad does it need to get?
To stop a parent from being with their child, very bad indeed. Like repeatedly preachibg hate and asking people to kill civilians (tge hook guy).
Not someone who has only been convicted of driving whilst disqualified and drivibg off from an accident, remember he has not been charged with killing or causing death.
Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 18,423
/\ Posting from a phone?
Or just on drugs?
Or just on drugs?
This is why our justice system sucks.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2007
- Posts
- 52,812
- Location
- Tamworth, UK
Appalling.
Why? Once you pick out the details and ignore the imotional bs im finding it hard to see the problem.
What a mind boggling decision these judges took...mind staggering decision...he gets jailed for 4mths for essentially killing someone coupled with the fact that he wasnt supposed to be driving and the biggest kicker is that he was an asylum seeker so really had no rights to stay here.
So the judges decide to let him stay because he has kids but its pretty certain that he wasnt even living with the mother of his kids...yet the judges decide to give him a paltry sentence and give him permanent stay
Well done justice system of the UK, its no freakin wonder we are a joke if the judges we have give out utterly stupid and degrading sentences such as this.
So the judges decide to let him stay because he has kids but its pretty certain that he wasnt even living with the mother of his kids...yet the judges decide to give him a paltry sentence and give him permanent stay
Well done justice system of the UK, its no freakin wonder we are a joke if the judges we have give out utterly stupid and degrading sentences such as this.
He did not get jailed for killing anyone or for causing a death. He got jailed for disqualification and leaving an accident, which 4 months is a very reasonable punishment.
judges can only rightly go on facts and as such, is it right to refuse entry on the basis of disqualification and leaving an accident and depriving a child of their parent.
Last edited:
are we letting all illegals kill for free now?
Yes why shouldnt he??...is he some sort of special case???...screw human rights in this case....he doesnt belong here simple as that....hes an asylum seeker who should have been sent back and if not then jailed for a very long time as hes taken another life.
again where has he killed?
someone died, that does not mean he killed.
more assumptions, he has not killed in the eyes of the law and as such judges can not base it on biased assumptions.
why does he deserve a long time in jail? what laws has he broke to deserve a longtime in jail and what are the guidelines for the laws he has broken.
Agree entirely, there are two seperate things at hand here.
He was caught and charged relating the accident, obviously the articles tone would suggest he was charged with causing death by dangerous driving, he wasn't so we should assume this not to be the case. My uncle spent 6 months inside because someone who had written a suicide note jumped out in front of his car (it took 6 months for the suicide note to surface somehow, think maybe the family hid it), it's just an example of how it's not always black and white though, RTA leading to someone dying does not mean the person who didn't die is at fault. He was charged with what he is at fault for.
As a result of the charges that have been made against him, no different from if he'd crashed into a parked car and driven off, should he be deported seperating him from his family? I'd say no, and obviously the law agrees.
So where's the punishment for killing the girl? What does it take to get you deported, if running a girl over without a driving license and leaving her for dead won't?
He's not been punished presumably because it was deemed that his actions didn't kill her. If that's been decided by one court of law then it's irrelevant to the other.
Their isn't one as it was deemed he did not kill the girl.
For example if a person ran out ion front of you from behind a parked lorry, did you kill them? No it was an accident and as such no law broken and you did not kill them.
/\ Posting from a phone?
Or just on drugs?
Phone although moved to pc now.
roll on android/wm7 tablets.
acidhell, you're missing the point: he shouldn't have been in the country, he was banned from driving (why wasn't he kicked out the first time he was caught?) he fled the scene (illegal) the girl may have survived had he sought medical assistance. we are being made a laughing stock with decisions like this.