In my opinion, probably not. That's why there's little or no evidence to suggest that occasional exposure to Internet pornography damages children. The only example they could come up with was ridiculously extreme, citing murder as a possible consequence of Internet pornography because two kids who had a 'toxic' home life including exposure to pornography attacked some other kids. Totally, utterly, ludicrous inference.As pointed out, is internet porn really that big an issue compared to everything else that they are exposed to?
I suspect occasional exposure to pornography would provoke curiosity amongst the majority of stable children, and only those from unstable backgrounds would be so negatively affected. On that basis, if we are going to initially filter Internet pornography for them, we should better block all pornography and anything else remotely edgy on every single delivery medium.
Last edited: