If it makes you feel any better I'm not in any way emotional over this, but if that makes a disagreement too hard to understand if one of the participants isn't red in the face then it's fine if you stick to the ironic accusations.
Whether or not kwerk 'often' makes silly threads is irrelevant (regardless, I don't follow him and any of his 'extracurricular activities' quoted in this thread haven't been inflammatory or stupid), people are attacking his original post saying he is stupid (why is it stupid to dislike something and give reasons for doing so?), trolling (as said before, I could understand if this was forums.restaurantowners.co.uk, but it's not, is it?), or a loser (we won't even go into that one). They quote his posts and say these things, and there is a very large gap in between that says a lot about the people saying it and not the original poster.
And if you're not clear on what we're talking about, then maybe I'm not the only one who 'can't read'. All my previous posts are there to be viewed and disagreed with. In fact, you quoted one of them.
And your whole current 'everyone has their opinions' vibe is hilarious given your original interjection stating that people are justified in acting like this given what kwerk has posted and that I didn't 'even read what kwerk has posted' and was clearly foolish for not disliking him personally along with 'most' other posters here for his opinions (and yet even with that, apparantly I'm the one getting wound up and taking it personally here, right?).
And you've ignored my request to post what is offensive in his original post, so I guess it's fair to say you're going to backtrack on this one and return to the easy name-calling on the sidelines?