Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 35,717
Things don't move on their own. Fake.
Not really... Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. The honus is on the believers to prove it... Not the sceptics to disprove it.
I think real evidence is just as useful no matter which side provides it. The prosecution and the defence should both actively seek to produce proof. The true 'investigator' is one who remains impartial to hearsay from either side.
In before Lysander's obligatory comment about how real it looks.
But certainly not in the case of the paranormal. You can't prove something is not real... Period. So the argument is flawed.
The only people that need to prove anything are the ones that believe.


Its ok, they've had Derek Acorah on the case
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...tbuster-Derek-Acorah-sends-spook-packing.html
"There is an angry spirit in this room, a man called Jim who died around 1900. He may have lived at this spot or farmed the land here.
"He died of a heart attack aged 58, and he has never passed fully into the spirit world. Now we are going to send Jim from this place."
Fake
ok guys im off to make my own Fake but Real Poltergeist.
Get String......done
Tie to Chair..... done.
Camera coincedently in the right place..... done.
Post on news.... done.
Cmon, lets see something real like a chair spinning on the spot at the same time cupboards opening and closing, whilst someone is making grunting noises
Relax. It's just the invisible man.

Oh, you couldn't be more wrong. People have been travelling the world to disprove so-called supernatural phenomena for years. It is very important work as there are an abundance of fakes out there and some of these criminals make MILLIONS out of their 'art'. An example is Uri Geller: he is a multi-millionaire because he has skillfully conned a lot of vulnerable or ignorant people out of their money. The work of people like James Randi is vital in exposing bad eggs like Geller and bringing their fakery into the spotlight.
That's fair enough, but a little lazy surely. If I want to know more about something I'll research it, what's wrong with that?
just mindlessly believing something from one video is laughable - either way.