Osama bin Laden is dead - no graphic/violent images.

To question him.... Gain some more information.

Like he would give any information up, it would be a waste if time.

The question on everyone's mind lately though is Why did Obama change the facts about the events which took place all of a sudden?

He released info as to what happened, he then released info with different events, and then everyone is expected to believe him?
 
Like he would give any information up, it would be a waste if time.

The question on everyone's mind lately though is Why did Obama change the facts about the events which took place all of a sudden?

He released info as to what happened, he then released info with different events, and then everyone is expected to believe him?

How do you know he wouldnt?

We live in a society where we're told to not to run in all guns blazing!
 
I'm sure Guantanamo is full of lots of completely innocent people who are being framed by the government.

And erm, stuff.


actually some were. the US offered a lot of money for info, so people accused others of being taliban, etc... to get some cash. so there were innocent held for years before they got released. And for the ones that aren't innocent then charge them and sentence them. this guantanamo fiasco is medieval and not very civilized. even sociopaths like Charles Manson got a fair trial. oh wait he is white ;)
 
Last edited:
Did he, or was it one of the spokes people getting confused with the information as carney said in one of his press statements. Info was rush out and mistakes made, mainly due to assumptions. Can't post what carney said as on phone.
 
It has been confirmed that Osama was unarmed..... He was apparently resisting arrest (or whatever). So what did the Special Forces do next....... Shoot him in the head!

Sorry but that was wrong!

As with many people you have the notion in your head that combat should be fair. Ideally Osama and Obama should meet at dawn and battle with fences until one opponent draws first blood on the other. The loser then surrenders to the victors terms, they bow to one another and go on their way. As silly as this sounds many people use such guidelines to judge whether a given combat situation was fair or not. This is fantasy.

The Reality:

Real combat is anything but fair. It is about getting the advantage over the opponent and pressing it home. Just because the enemy is at your mercy doesn't mean he gets a get out of jail free card. Examples:

When soldiers charge an enemy line and break it they will just as often kill the guys in the foxholes, even if they throw down arms and wave white flags. This isn't murder or a warcrime.

During the first Gulf War I think we all know the famous image of the Highway of Death. Fleeing Iraqi soldiers for the most part in comandeered civilian vehicles were straffed by jets and helicopters without mercy. The allies had almost total superiority and the enemy was broken and fleeing.

At the end of WWII when Berlin was surrounded the war was basically over and Germany was no longer a threat to anyone. The allies pressed home and finished them off completely.

Near the end the Japanaese had lost most of their navy, the surrounding islands taken and they were all but defeated. The allies could have stalled for peace talks, but they nuked them into full submission anyways.

The point is that war is not fair. When the enemy is down you don't suddenly stop attacking. You kick him in the face as he is laying there so to speak.

The western nations declared a war on terrorists long ago. What that really means is that your life as the enemy becomes real uncertain. Whether you live or die basically comes down to the whim of the guy with a gun pointed at you.

The balance in the system is the huge military court system like in the TV series JAG. I'm very sure that the guy who pulled the trigger on Osama will have some hard questions to answer.
 
I think its pretty clear what kind of a war I was referring to.

I'm not going to bother with making it any clearer for someone who seems to be a bin laden sympathizer.
 
how come people who think he should have been captured alive for inteligence purposes are labeled sympathizers or suporters....

its what the white house claimed they would always do anyway
It is now being reported bin Laden may have been reaching for a weapon. Are US officials making it up as they go along?
its usually what police say when they shoot someone and ask questions after aswell and usually a gun never turns up....
 
the whole story is made up
the americans have just gone and made the world a whole load more dangerous
i dont see why they cant just say this is what we done here is the proof and have done with it all, but they cant, because we are not being told the truth.
and, its a cert that there is going to be huge retaliations huge ! that will effect us all in the long run.
 
It does make you think, that 3 officials from the whitehouse have all come out with 3 different stories. It also seems stupid to just bury the body in the sea why did they not take him back to US for evidence? Or even photograph him in Pakistan.
 
It does make you think, that 3 officials from the whitehouse have all come out with 3 different stories. It also seems stupid to just bury the body in the sea why did they not take him back to US for evidence? Or even photograph him in Pakistan.

Because that would have seriously p'd off the religious nutters!
Bodies have to be buried within a short time span under Islamic law/tradition.
 
Back
Top Bottom