So DM's saying that Berbatov was the linchpin to Utd's attack in the 08/09 season and that the Rooney/Ronaldo/Berbatov trio was Utd's best attack? The fact that Utd were a far better attacking side the season before, scored more goals and were more successful the season before when their attack was Tevez/Ronaldo/Rooney, might prove otherwise.
But not wanting to feel left out, well said DM
Don't forget Ronaldo went from a 31 goal spectacular, to a 16-18 goal season. Which pretty much accounts exactly for the 12 less goals they scored in the season. Tevez was hardly prolific at Utd either, some years you score more with a worse attack, sometimes a great attack won't get the goals, thats life.
Berbatov linked up better with Rooney and Ronaldo than Tevez did, which is in large part why Berbatov was played more and did more that next season while Tevez became a bit part player. That doesn't mean Tevez sucked, for me Tevez + Rooney were just the same player trying to do the same role.
Theres ways to twist and use every stat negatively and positively.
When I see Berbatov play I see, posession, fantastic passing, ability to hold it up, ability to, yes, we've seen him run around the outside of decent fullbacks and get in the box, we've seen him do unreal tricks in the area to beat players, great goals, less great goals, great assists, less great ones.
He's a great player, thats what I care about in all this, unlike the people who suggest Adam is crap because ultimately Blackpool went down, a great player is a great player and he really is a great player. Often misused IMHO, yet still effective.
Appearances mean nothing, too often someone who doesn't run after every player all the time gets grief, yet 99% of the time that harassing produces nothing and is a complete waste. Rooney did almost none of that time wasting harassing last season, and he pulled his best scoring season out of a bag, by a massive margin.
Anyway, Berbatov has had 3 excellent seasons for Utd, thats the problem with Utd and other fans, they saw 30mil and thought 30 goals, he wasn't that player when they brought him, he wasn't a Defoe/RVN/Raul/Higuain type player, never remotely pretended to be.
Utd fans didn't see 20+ goals and decided he was crap, in all but a handful of games over 3 seasons he's been excellent.
Theo walcott is absolute tosh, yet he got 9 goals, its literally unbelievable, yet I still wouldn't have him. Its how bad he is for 89 minutes that makes him useless, the 89 minutes where we concede because he doesn't ever put in any defensive effort in the slightest, can't hold posession, can't pass or cross, can't do much of anything.
Even when Berbatov's not scoring he's an always available outball who can do pretty much anything you need with the ball.