London **** WALK

You're confusing the perception people have of a victim based on their dress with the risk factor of their dress as regards being raped. To the latter it would appear from the research that it's not (a factor). You're making the assertion that it is, show me some evidence.

You know I'm still waiting for you to show me the evidence to the contrary. Apparently you have it (or were you just going on the assumption that google scholar has it somewhere and that there wouldn't be a shred to the contrary?), so how about you put me out of my misery and reveal it?

Yes I was going on what I believe to be true, if there happens to be evidence of that then all the better, I really can't be arsed to look given the topic. So far you've shown me absolutely no evidence that what you're saying is more than just what believe yet you insist the evidence is there.
 
You know now I'm just confused. Its taken you 4 posts to finally bother to say there is actually evidence to suggest I'm wrong instead of just outright denying it.

Oh and the first article I looked at on google scholar.

"As predicted, males rated the victim more deserving of the attack than females. As predicted, the suggestively dressed victim was rated more responsible and deserving than the somberly dressed victim."

Because its clearly a simple topic that can be dismissed in 2 sentences. But anyway, this is getting pointless. Unless you actually feel like posting some links instead of just saying 'look'.

You just presented "men think this" as evidence that it is actually true... well done, that is real special.
 
29c0t9y.gif
 
You just presented "men think this" as evidence that it is actually true... well done, that is real special.

Did I ever pretend to be saying anything other than what I believe is the case? Yet all I've come across so far are a couple of idiots insulting me, claiming my statement is rubbish without actually posting ANY proof to the contrary. Since you 2 jokers seem to have access to a wellspring of information perhaps you could share it to show that my theory is wrong?
 
Did I ever pretend to be saying anything other than what I believe is the case? Yet all I've come across so far are a couple of idiots insulting me, claiming my statement is rubbish without actually posting ANY proof to the contrary. Since you 2 jokers seem to have access to a wellspring of information perhaps you could share it to show that my theory is wrong?

It is up to you to prove your theory is correct.

qPuqp.jpg
 
Because Ricky Gervais says so?

Choose to believe my opinion or don't. I was told there is evidence to suggest I'm wrong yet neither of you seem capable of linking it. So either shut up or post it.
 
Last edited:
LOL. Do these poeple have nothing better to do?

Nah, some Girl Power and all that laughable crap. Excuses for the uglies, rejects and fatties to come out of the woodwork and away from the PC monitors and bitchy blogs for a few hours and make idiots of themselves.

Loved the interviews and how strongly these fools felt about their 'views'.
 
If it's in order to dress up like prostitutes and parade around, I think there's scope for someone to dress up like a pimp and follow a 'slutwalk' around, saying things like, 'bitch betta have mah money' and 'jus' takin' care of business' and stuff.
 
I don't know what all the argument is about.

All we need to consider is the amount of women 'x' raped in the time period 'y' and err... their individual **** ware ratings 'z'.
 
Its a completely fair point that anyone *should* be able to dress how they like.

It also shouldn't be used in any part of a rapist's defence - the offence is equally serious whether or not the victim was wearing a short skirt or had been drinking.

Though IMO the policeman did have a fair point - dressing like a **** likely does increase the risk.

I should be able to put my wallet and phone on display in the back seat of my car without worrying about them getting stolen - in reality I'm increasing the risk that my car will be broken into.

The fact that the wallet and phone were there isn't an excuse for the person breaking into the car and leaving them on display doesn't mean you deserve to get robbed but it certainly increases the risk.

A girl getting drunk and walking home alone in revealing clothing doesn't deserve to get raped, likely won't get raped (as it is thankfully not *that* common) but is likely increasing the risk to herself.
 
Yea. Even my ex confirmed this. They want the attention and when they get it it angers them. When they DON'T get it, it angers them too. Surely the sign of a healthy mind :p

They want attention from men they fancy, which is 10% of the men the encounter at best.
 
I'd like to see them try their "**** walk" in downtown Joburg.

Leave an ipad on your car seat, expect to have it stolen. Same principle.
 
Back
Top Bottom