Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
So, a Intel Core i3 540 3.06GHz will beat an AMD Athlon II X4 Quad Core 640 3.00GHz without any overclocking etc and will run cooler?
Looking at building a new PC and cost / performance is high on the list. Onboard GPU is fine for me.
yes.
I like the i3. less hassle, no third party cooler required, and no messing about with motherboards.
So, a Intel Core i3 540 3.06GHz will beat an AMD Athlon II X4 Quad Core 640 3.00GHz without any overclocking etc and will run cooler?
Looking at building a new PC and cost / performance is high on the list. Onboard GPU is fine for me.
So stick with the Athlon Quad?
Tiny bit of gaming otherwise, photoshop and bog standard stuff
Dont get Llano, thats a bad idea, its too expensive at the moment for what it offers.
Thats what i though. Might just get the Athlon Quad and a nice mobo / ram
But 2.6 as opposed to 3ghz. Or is it still much better than the Athlon?
Ok, so if i had to choose what would be the best performance boost:
i3 or a Llano? Which mobo/ram combo (Really a noob when putting spec together)
Going to be the i3 2100 still
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-a8-3800_11.html#sect1
Still faster than A8 3800 Llano, the dual core sandybridge is even faster than the quad core cpu in multi threaded tasks![]()
It consumes less power at full load, and how many SATA3.0 drives would you be using? there are still a few SATA2.0 connectors on the H67 board for say a optical drive or a normal mechanical harrdrive.
That is the review of the 65W A8-3800 which has lower clockspeeds.