Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 7,634
- Location
- Ireland/Northern Ireland Border
Yeah as it stands they aren't ready to govern. But the basic gist of their policies is what I agree with. And it isn't racist, it's just putting British people first for a change. I don't think this is wrong, I think it's sensible and fair.
No, the problem was created when a certain government decided the best way to deal with the failing economy was to employ as many people as possible into the public sector, by creating completley unnecessary jobs, and throw benefits at the rest.
Labour would have made most of the same cuts as the Tories, as would Lib Dem, two parties heavily heavily lied to YOU in the elections and one didn't.
Look at America, who are going down the "labout campaign promises route" have the world, someone else will pay for it, wooo. Their economy is closer to the brink than ours, and theirs is less reliant on the EU which is completely screwed.
All conservatives are doing is removing life support that SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN APPLIED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
We'll expose problems that have been bubbling under the surface for years, but Labours plan of, spend our way out of problems just means the problems get worse and blow up in our faces bigger, worse and far more dangerously than they would have if we ever governered the country properly.
How the hell can you still support Labour when its plain to see the utter crap job they've done, everywhere, in everything, and jesus christ, look who is in charge of them, seriously, the entire leadership is made up of just about the most hateful, spiteful **** of a woman in the entire country, a guy who literally comes across as retarded when he speaks(not just the voice), and a whole other bunch of idiot union puppets who have done their best to ruin this country.
Education, joke, NHS, joke, Policing, joke, transport, joke, foreign policy and getting into illegal and 100% unnecessary wars largely responsible for the increases in spending, deficit and debt, joke.
Afraid they're going to be needed this weekend, 2nd Saturday in August and all that.
It's very easy for Cameron to authorise the use of items he knows logistically are nigh on impossible to deploy, he just thinks it makes him look good for the voters.
Just saw this on the bbc and made me lol in my office
"1055: BBC Monitoring Libyan foreign ministry spokesman Khalid Ka'im has called on world governments to take action over the unrest in the UK. David Cameron has lost legitimacy and "must go", Libya's official news agency Jana reports. Libya "demands that the international community not stand with arms folded in the face of this gross aggression against the rights of the British people, who are demanding its right to rule its country", the report said."
LOL WUT![]()
I don't know why.
I said from the start the army were not needed. Not to sound smug at all, I just knew that police could handle it although it is far from over it has to be said.
It is racist to decide that being not white = not british which has always been the fundamental theme of the BNP.
Only took three days of rioting for the Met to get a grip on the situation, now we have large gangs of armed/drunk vigilantes patrolling the streets of London too. The Met can take no credit at all from last night's relative calm, they've been thoroughly embarrassed as an organisation.
It is racist to decide that being not white = not british which has always been the fundamental theme of the BNP.
It's London mate, not Mos Eisley.
It is not a huge task to ship some from Northern Ireland.
The clean up pictures yesturday shown had at least 85% white people and 15% other, so its no surprise that its become a lot like black v white.
Breaking news on BBC:
Breaking News Prime Minister David Cameron
Nothing is off the table. There are contingency plans for water cannon to be used at 24 hours notice.
It's the left that is so against active policing of working class scum, ie your lotPerhaps if they hadn't hamstrung the police with constant attacks and accusations of heavy handedness and brutality when they've tried to deal with rioting scum in the past, they'd have been more prepared to act this time?
I made an educated guess - what's wrong with that? I watch the paper review on Sky and BBC each night, and that's what I based it on.nice statistics, make them up out of thin air to justify your post? ace
well my survey says that the looting is 100% nothing to do with race
wow according to that statistic, looks like im correct - well done me!
Why 24 hrs' notice? What does that mean?
Why 24 hrs' notice? What does that mean?
I'm left-authoritarian, not left-liberal so I don't have a "lot".
Agreed (I've been harping on about the emasculation of the police for years), I was one of the few members sticking up for the police over the tragic death of Ian Tomlinson. Funny how the same people who were calling for the policeman who pushed my Tomlinson to be done for murder are now calling for a more heavy-handed approach to rioters, I'm afraid you've made a rod for your own backs there.
I'm afraid you've made a rod for your own backs there.
24 hours after your shop has been ransacked and set ablaze a water cannon will turn up to put it out.