Riots in Tottenham, London! (NO RACIST COMMENTS)

Status
Not open for further replies.
+1 this was never said.

Who did say this? The media were doing their very best on Sunday. I pretty sure I remember seeing the Metro claiming the IPCC stated he fired two days ago? The media all seem to have gone quiet on who said he fired/fired first.
 
so any news if the police have picked up dominic noonan yet after him showing his face yesterday directing traffic mid riot ?
 

"I just saw on the news all the people rioting were black and all the people cleaning up were white..."

That's the thing. There's no need for such a comment. They saw people rioting, and saw people cleaning up, that's it.

When you start mentioning it like the above, I think it opens it up for the more obvious racist comments.

As an aside... I've been posting on a football forum in a thread about this aswell over the last few days, and there hasn't even been a suggestion along these lines.
 
The thing is though, what defines a racist remark in this case?

"I just saw on the news all the people rioting were black and all the people cleaning up were white..."


That is probably what a lot of people are seeing and then it provokes remarks like that, I don't think it is being directly racist.

Saying things like -

"There are no black people in my area so we are safe from riots..."


Is more openly racist.

Ok so indirect racism vs open direct racism.

Still racism
 
Ok so indirect racism vs open direct racism.

Still racism

So if people mention the word black they are racist?

What about the people saying most of them was kids? Are they ageist?


Honestly. What is wrong with some of you. This whole "ZOMG RACIST SCUM BAN HIM" is pathetic
 
It is a deliberate tactical ploy by groups such as the BNP and EDL who know they can use social media and the internet to swell their numbers by having an active cell presence. It is the simular propagation device to the way evangelical christians operate. They are encouraged at a congregational level to 'take part' in communities such as these.

Better wear a tin helmet then.


Imo, it makes no difference what colour or religion they are, they should all be shot.
 
he was being followed and opened fire on the officers.

He shot the officer from Scotland Yard’s elite firearms squad CO19 in the side of his chest with a handgun.

The bullet lodged in the police radio that the undercover officer was carrying in a side pocket

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...police-London-cab-shootout.html#ixzz1UdbLq9Z6

untill the FULL report comes out it is all speculation imo. the press have said many things about it.

I have no issue with him being ****, carry a gun and karma will get you. I also fully support the police, but to know what actually happened. the full report will need to come out.
 
Metro

Officers shouted at the man to stop but he turned and fired his weapon, hitting one policeman. Luckily, the bullet seemed to ricochet off his radio, and after brief medical attention he was able to go home.

The gunman was not so lucky, however, as he was shot by marksman after discharging his weapon.

LSE

A gun was found at the scene and a spokesman for the independent police watchdog said it appeared the officer was shot first before police returned fire.

Guardian

A father of three died instantly after an apparent exchange of fire when police attempted to arrest him in north London, it emerged on Friday.

Telegraph

A policeman's life was saved by his radio last night after gunman Mark Duggan opened fire on him and the bullet hit the device.

Looks like the papers played their part in claiming he fired/fired first and now not a peep after finding out he didn't.

PS - I am not one of the people who think because he didn't open fire, it wasn't justification for the police to shoot.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom