If we built a gulag, we could have both.![]()
No, we'd have a gulag, and that will only make matters worse. Not a worthwhile solution.
If we built a gulag, we could have both.![]()
The welfare state has failed? No, it is the allocation of that welfare, plus the inadequate and inefficient reforms of the education system which have failed. You are throwing the baby with the water.
And when do you hear about firearms incidents settled with out the need to discharge a firearm?
Is it the education system that's the problem, or is it that kids are being bred who are incapable of being educated properly due to underdeveloped brains?
Posted this a while ago, it's a very interesting read with lots of scientific evidence, particularly Chapter 2, and it certainly explains a lot of the behaviours of the "problem kids" I went to school with (all of whom came from poor families on council estates).
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/109074.aspx
She has a good point though and it shut up the guy behind her![]()
lol cant do right from wrong
maybe ship them out somewhere really horrible
stop all benefits and kick them out of their homes
Local Authorities have a duty to house the homeless.
They can kick them out of council housing for anti-social behaviour though, all that will happen is that they'll be forced into some grotty private bedsit or similar.Local Authorities have a duty to house the homeless.
I don't support the abolishment of the welfare state, just a fundamental reform of the system.
Our welfare state does fail the most vunerable, by ensuring they remain that way and putting constant barriers in the way of improvement. it also fails the workers who pay for it by making people not working better off than many workers...
Then the Polish go on a rampage for us sending them a load of "one step up from a criminal"s?![]()
The answer to this is not remove the safety net, but make working more attractive by dramatically improving the pay people get for working.
Not so clear cut. If everyone gets more money, everything gets more expensive - nulling the point in the first place.The answer to this is not remove the safety net, but make working more attractive by dramatically improving the pay people get for working.
The answer to this is not remove the safety net, but make working more attractive by dramatically improving the pay people get for working.
err dolph didn't say to remove the net.
dramatically raising wages dramatically raises costs which means you have to dramatically raise benefits for them to be liveable then you're in the exact same situation
Seriously how did you think that would work?
Really now, I just can't see how that got past even a cursory check of the maths part of your brain?
err dolph didn't say to remove the net.
dramatically raising wages dramatically raises costs which means you have to dramatically raise benefits for them to be liveable then you're in the exact same situation
Seriously how did you think that would work?
Really now, I just can't see how that got past even a cursory check of the maths part of your brain?
The answer to this is not remove the safety net, but make working more attractive by dramatically improving the pay people get for working.
All this labour bashing (which I actually agree with) made me recall an old monkey dust clip.