Price: Porsche = £126,000..............GT-R = £72,00
Nurburgring Auto Sport time: Porsche = 7:44 (dry)..............GT-R = 7:34 (dry)
Why there is only one 2 second car in the test: R&T, just like C&D and Motortrend, use roll-out. That’s 1 ft, so approx 0.3 shaved off a European 0-60 test. Headline numbers sell.
@90mph, the Porsche has travelled 445 feet. The GT-R has travelled 443 feet. 2 feet = £27,000 per foot.*
@122mph, the Porsche has travelled 1124 feet. The GT-R has travelled 1094 feet. 30 feet = £1800 per foot.* Or...
The Porsche is 15 foot long. @122 mph, the distance from the front of the GT-R to the back of the Porsche is a single 911 car length. Or...
Next time you hit 122mph from the toll booth in your “performance” car, what do you think the driver of the “performance” car one length ahead of you is thinking?
*I have not applied “Yeah, but it’s a Nissan” -75% correction factor.
1 Veyron SS = 30 GT-Rs
30 GT-Rs = 15,900 BHP.
Top speed = Mach 7.5 (5,708mph)
0-60 with no rollout = 96 seconds before you tried.
2 are great cars and I don’t think there is much quicker from A to B. The Porsche has a lot going for it, regardless of price. Given even remotely competent drivers in each, neither will drop the other or overtake the other on anything resembling a normal B road. I’m glad both are around and it’s healthy competition. If this continues down the route I hope it goes, we’ll be enjoying some very quick cars from both sooner rather than later.
The other is, love it or hate it, pretty much the pinnacle of shifting automotive mass astonishingly quickly. The last 30 sec onds of the EVO vid at Brunters where the GT-R has a running start truly shows just how rapid it is.
Not as good as the first video in this thread though.
Vice Captain -Nissan Defence League