Processor speed for the AMD: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_lookup.php?cpu=AMD+E-350
Same for i3-2367M: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i3-2367M+@+1.40GHz
The i3 demolishes the AMD in any meaningful comparison. If of course you only need this for browsing etc, go for the AMD. I personally needed something that could also do some proper business; I initially wanted an X220 but the X121e covered my needs admirably.
Its not that the A-350 is useless, its just that if you see how much faster the i3 is you will wonder why you didn't spend that extra bit. Well, I would anyway, though the A-350 is probably the best cost/power ratio.
The Ideapad is for all purposes similar to performance with the AMD X121e that's now not for sale in the UK - but with slower memory & hard drive. When the X121e was available, it was with fast memory and 7200 drive for £270 I think.
Having said that, I cannot stand ugly things and the S205 is *very* ugly, so I would never buy it. The X121e is simply put, beautiful (in the special Thinkpad kind of way).
Same for i3-2367M: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i3-2367M+@+1.40GHz
The i3 demolishes the AMD in any meaningful comparison. If of course you only need this for browsing etc, go for the AMD. I personally needed something that could also do some proper business; I initially wanted an X220 but the X121e covered my needs admirably.
Its not that the A-350 is useless, its just that if you see how much faster the i3 is you will wonder why you didn't spend that extra bit. Well, I would anyway, though the A-350 is probably the best cost/power ratio.
The Ideapad is for all purposes similar to performance with the AMD X121e that's now not for sale in the UK - but with slower memory & hard drive. When the X121e was available, it was with fast memory and 7200 drive for £270 I think.
Having said that, I cannot stand ugly things and the S205 is *very* ugly, so I would never buy it. The X121e is simply put, beautiful (in the special Thinkpad kind of way).
Last edited: