Battlefield 3 thread - Server details in opening post -
- Thread starter [TFU] Thegoon84
- Start date
- Status
I'm still using a res of 1600x900 on high settings and the game looks great, im not sure maybe just how much i am missing out on by not using full HD but the graphics look great so i'll stick with it for now
Just a shame it would never see the light of day :/
To control that on a console would be a nightmare.
dreauce - have you recently re installed windows?
Sounds to me like you are missing the punkbuster client.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 20 Apr 2011
- Posts
- 7,373
- Location
- Suffolk
I'm still using a res of 1600x900 on high settings and the game looks great, im not sure maybe just how much i am missing out on by not using full HD but the graphics look great so i'll stick with it for now
Quite a bit actually, the higher the res the better the details. But if you are happy then stick with it m8. You don't miss what you can't see
It's not new, it has been posted here before
Also http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/forum/threadview/2832654489499878081/1/
Just got that myself. It really is a useless system, It kicks the none hackers but the hackers seem safe..
Voorhees cheers for that, i just noticed the board you have and thats the same one i have been looking at getting for an i5 upgrade. How do you find it? It seems to be a good budget board and im not looking to cross fire or anything like that just wanna try and get an OC of around 4.2ghz-4.5ghz with it
This just proves that DICE just don't give a **** now they have our money.
Somebody even went to the trouble to design them a new UI, which everybody loved, but they couldn't even be bothered implementing it.
As others have said, DICE always make a game, rush it, **** it up, then move onto another game and leave it ****ed.
again, something else that was left out because this was rushed.
They managed so many things in BC2 better. In some respects its a step back ....
How hard would it be to have charts for us showing damage, range, recoil etc..
They managed so many things in BC2 better. In some respects its a step back ....
How hard would it be to have charts for us showing damage, range, recoil etc..
Jesus man that's a lot of hate....
Simple fact is, the interface would not work on console, console in todays world is a big big market, bigger than PC.
Therefore it would not be cost effective.
I think the hud/menus are fine as they are to be honest, and the game is awesome.
console don't even have a chat window or a commo rose lol.
They are already PC only. Hardly any of those changes on that screen would make it across. That second screen could easily work on a console, not that it matters much as i find the default screen alright. But to say its not been done because they can't is BS.
They are already PC only. Hardly any of those changes on that screen would make it across. That second screen could easily work on a console, not that it matters much as i find the default screen alright. But to say its not been done because they can't is BS.
I really don't think this is required, if you look on the battlelog weapons info it gives you gun stats like range, caliber etc. This is the stats you would get in real life so should be good enough.
Personally I dont like it when guns in games have artificial damage points, in BF3 the damage is based off the size of bullet you are firing, the rest is just personal preference.
MrLol - I'm not saying it cant be done, but they wont do it, it wouldnt work well on consoles and would be spending time and money on something that isn't currently broken.
This is business after all people, it's sadly all about the money :/
What I will say is tho, they have given us a fantastic game, that is only getting better with time.
Last edited:
please point me in the direction of where in battle log it compares the effective range of the different assault rifles ??
It doesn't, they are all the ****ing same. Which of course they aren't. And theres no ratings for damage etc.. Its just shoddy and rushed.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2003
- Posts
- 29,640
- Location
- Chelmsford
- Status