Lolradox
Lolradox
:shrug:
Lol, if it's just instinct, nothing can happen re: that offence. It's already been said that they basically can't convict on silence alone (there are obvious exceptions, such as refusing to give passwords for computers, etc), so the CPS isn't going to proceed with that one. However, if they have reason to believe you have committed an offence, and you refuse to give your name, that's an offence, though.
Chris [BEANS];21490575 said:What rational reason would the police have to persue an innocent person?!
I did answer that, as other people in the thread have done... if you bothered to read properly.
If they have reason to believe you're involved (as in, actual reason, like you fit the description/are acting suspiciously/etc... they can't just randomly snatch people from the street!) they'll take you in and require you to give your name and take the standard DNA/photo/fingerprints (that could possibly be avoided by just talking to them when they stop you, explaining who are you/what you're doing...).
You won't subsequently get convicted for any of the crimes in this ~spate of criminal activity~, but you will get done for refusing to give your name when they had reason to believe you had committed an offence.

YOU STILL HAVEN'T ANSWERED THE QUESTION.
There could be a few weeks before those two bits and they haven't actually established who you are.

Quite simple really. Taking your example:
You are detained/arrested (dependant on country) on suspicion of committing a crime. This give police certain powers including requiring you to provide your:
Name
DOB
Address
Place of Birth
To refuse this makes you guilty of an offence irrespective of your guilt to the initial suspected offence.
Due to refusing this, you are kept in custody to appear at court on the next lawful day as your identity cannot be verified. After being taken to court, this ends the police involvement. If you further choose to not disclose your details to a sheriff/judge, you can be held in contempt of court and receive another conviction.
What the sheriff/judge chooses to do is upto them but you didn't ask about what they would do, only the police![]()
![]()
How is that skirting around the issue/wrong?
I wonder what conviction number is higher? Scumbags who constantly give a "No Comment" Statement or Honest people that tell the truth? Hummmmm....
Maybe i am just being Cynical.
Here is an page i read and is VERY interesting..
EDIT: After reading again there were a few swearies but do a search for "No Comment The Defendants Guide To Arrest"
What I said was correct, and I didn't skirt around the issues... I answered each of your questions. I suggest your formulate better questions, in the future :3. If someone asks a simple, specific question... I'm going to give a simple answer, aren't I!
Because there wasn't really anything else of substance in the middle! What I said covered everything important, everything of note.
Again, I blame the person asking the poor questions.
Nah, just checked. He didn't mention anything else which was important :3.
Don't make me neg rep you on SV.