It is a worrying trend. I think if I really wanted the job I'd walk them around the account as a 'reference'. I've got nothing to hide on there but there's no way I'd give free access to the account.
I found it more worrying that my misses got asked for full access to her medical records with a job offer a few months back. She's an accountant FFS and it was one of the conditions of the offer.
She didn't want / need the job so we didn't get to the point of telling them no, but simply the fact that they had the audacity to ask was scary!
It's stupid, companies should be forbidden to ask at all. The same with medical records and anything that invades your privacy. What if I went for a job and didn't get it because of a medical condition they found out about?
Don't be a sheep & don't have a FB account - Simples
Why should employers not be allowed to assess the best candidate for the job?
Why should employers not be allowed to assess the best candidate for the job?
Do you condone looking at FB accounts? Bugging phones and houses too?
I neither condone nor condemn the first (the second is just an argument to the absurd fallacy). it is for each individual to decide what terms of employment they are willing to accept, and for the job market to determine the appropriate level of compensation for those terms need to be.
Not happy with the terms, don't take the job, simple.
It really is a non-issue.
I quite agree, I would walk out of any company who requested such details.
I don't see why any company would need to see a FB account, it's an invasion of privacy, as is wanting to listen to all of my conversations on my mobile phone or read my txt messages. I see no difference between them.
No it isn't. I'd walk out straight away if I was asked this.
So would I, or at least, I would be expecting a very substantial premium for the potential impact on my life.
Money shouldn't compensate for privacy. They shouldn't be allowed to ask in the first place.
Facebook has 59 million users - and 2 million new ones join each week. But you won't catch Tom Hodgkinson volunteering his personal information - not now that he knows the politics of the people behind the social networking site.
The US intelligence community's enthusiasm for hi-tech innovation after 9/11 and the creation of In-Q-Tel, its venture capital fund, in 1999 were anachronistically linked in the article below. Since 9/11 happened in 2001 it could not have led to the setting up of In-Q-Tel two years earlier.
I despise Facebook. This enormously successful American business describes itself as "a social utility that connects you with the people around you". But hang on. Why on God's earth would I need a computer to connect with the people around me? Why should my relationships be mediated through the imagination of a bunch of supergeeks in California? What was wrong with the pub?...