• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3D Mark 11 scores**

psychodil said:
+1

Makes this result even more suspect IMO :confused:
Click to expand...

8 Pack stated you don't need a link on HWbot, just screen shots. In the rules it does state you need a link. If they allow scores with no links, it is easy to turn tesselation off at driver level allowing for much much higher scores.
 
gregster said:
Plenty of guys here will help and hopefully MyBrains will help but I reckon he wont give 100% help just in case ;) Maybe 99.99%
Click to expand...

Hehe.. Hmm I'm not too up on overclocking to be perfectly honest :) It's the volts that scare me! :p

Oh and i found this in my benchmark folder.. think i equalled 24th place with this one.. lol

P9858 3DMarks

GRAPHICS SCORE
9596
PHYSICS SCORE
11875
COMBINED SCORE
9391

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4130085

I seem to be getting pushed down recently so might have to do some more benches soon :D

nightfrogs said:
You beat me mate!

Score: 8499
Gfx: 8229
Phx: 10322
Cmb: 8347

www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4205999

MSI HD 7950 / i7-2600K @3.4Ghz

Any help to improve my score would be VERY appreciated! ;)
Click to expand...

Ok well max out the CCC clocks and leave voltages alone at first and see what happens. I can do that with 1100/1575 on stock volts but then to get higher clocks i use Trixx software to see how much further i can go without upping the volts. As for your CPU well thats something u need to research yourself as my system config is gona be different from yours :)

I mostly read up on what i know (Google is a very good friend) and reading stuff from forums is a big help too.. good luck!
 
Scores updated :) Our first 560TI 448 edition has now entered the charts and from those scores, a very capable card. Thanks for running the bench guys :)
 
gregster said:
Scores updated :) Our first 560TI 448 edition has now entered the charts and from those scores, a very capable card. Thanks for running the bench guys :)
Click to expand...

Have you noticed how close the HD5970s when oced get to the GTX 590s. I realise now how much nvidia screwed up the GTX 590 with its poor record on ocing.
 
Yjani said:
Thought id test out my 560ti 448 core before i sell it:

Score: 6357

Graphics Score - 6007
Physx Score - 8850
Combined - 6451

Core - 853, Ram 2112

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4237964
Click to expand...

how much voltage did you put?

I set 1.05V and get slightly better result: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4243564

3DMarks SCORE
P6279

GRAPHICS SCORE
6004
PHYSICS SCORE
7927
COMBINED SCORE
6488

Seems your graphics score is the same as mine but you got a lot better physics from Ivy Bridge.
 
Last edited:
gregster said:
3RD in the GPU scores though. Your card is faster than my £100 more card lol.
Click to expand...

Yeah she's a real gem ;)

I am building a system for a mate next week with a 3930K, I might do a sly bench with my 670 in it before giving it to him hehe, watch this space...

oh Greg, the screboard says I'm on a 3570K mate, I'm using a 3770K
 
Last edited:
leoncao said:
how much voltage did you put?

I set 1.05V and get slightly better result: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4243564

3DMarks SCORE
P6279

GRAPHICS SCORE
6004
PHYSICS SCORE
7927
COMBINED SCORE
6488

Seems your graphics score is the same as mine but you got a lot better physics from Ivy Bridge.
Click to expand...

I didnt touch the voltage at all bud, just straight forward memory and core clock increases. That was the Max i could get out of it without touching voltages
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom