Kate Middleton topless..

Naw, they'll like her more! why can't a royal do what "average joe public" does in the sun?? hilarious attitude! :rolleyes:

If they don't maintain an image of being better than joe public then joe public start to wonder why they give them tax money and the charade of monarchy starts to crumble. It's been happening already, every time Harry does something stupid there is often a backlash against the monarchy.
 
Apparently (BBC News) the pictures were offered to the British papers but were refused. Shock horror right?

I'm only surprised by the red tops not wanting them. Royal boobs are hardly newsworthy of The Telegraph or Independent etc. I am however surprised that a big UK newspaper doesn't buy the full rights to the picture and then just not use it though.
 
Right, so if you saw Kate in Sainsbury's whilst you were getting your work lunch you wouldn't even notice/stop/stare/get her autograph/take a photo/whatever? And you would look down on anyone who did any of these things?

Why would I? She's a lady who married into a family with a bit of notoriety, that's all. Just an ordinary person who, thanks to the press feeding off the public's insatiable thirst for gossip, now apparently can't go sunbathing without some charmless ****** snapping photos of her with a lens the size of the Hubble Space Telescope.

To pretend that celebrities are or should be treated exactly like normal people, no matter how intellectual you're pretending to be

I must have missed the memo letting me know that getting exasperated by the paparazzi and press intrusion into peoples lives now comes under the heading of 'pretending to be intellectual'. So allow me to put my opinion into words of one syllable, just for you:

You are a prat.

That 'un-intellectual' enough for you? :)
 
Last edited:
They shouldn't have said anything and ignored it. Seriously, boobs, whoop-dee-do, about half of the planet's population have them. Now they've played into the tabloids hands and a media frenzy has ensued.
 
It's been happening already, every time Harry does something stupid there is often a backlash against the monarchy.

That's odd, when ever Harry drops the ball his reputation as a person seems to improve. What events were you talking about?

As for Kate getting her tattas snapped, how many hundred acres does a site need to be to be considered private?
 
Back
Top Bottom