Capital One Cup Semi-Final - 8/9/22/23 January *** Spoilers ***

The ball pops out the other side of his body so it certainly appears like he got the ball.

edit: and it appears as if the kid is 17.

I assume you've never attended a physics class? Here, let me explain. Kinetic energy carries through objects. Example: Put 2 balls together, kick one, other moves. The kinetic energy carried through the ball boy.
 
The kid was being a douche, sure Hazard should have picked him up and thrown him out the way, instead he chose to kick the ball out from underneath a person, something footballers do most weekends, in training in general in life. THe kid shouldn't have been on the floor and shouldn't have been preventing Hazard getting to the ball in any way shape or form, the fact that he rolled between the ball and Hazard on purpose to stop him getting to the ball is the only reason Hazard got any of the kid and not only the ball.

If I deemed you to be a douche, should I be allowed to put my hands on you and kick at you even if I don't intend to harm you?

Seriously....
 
I personally don't have a big problem with a 17 year old chav getting a small kick in the ribs for acting like a **** if that's what you're asking.

You know him do you? He might have gone out to slow the game down, but how can you discriminate against the lad and condone what he got :confused:

By that logic, we should go kicking anyone that acts like a ****. That puts half the players in the league out, but don't let that stop your vigilante ways. In fact, buy a cape and cowl and call yourself the chav smasher.
 
If you'd watched the TV, you cannot see the ball when they zoom in on the boy on the floor. I assume it turned invisible, then?

Hazard has Xray vision he could see the ball through the ball boy, obviously his vision hadnt gone back to normal and didnt see the ball boy, so he thought he was just kicking the ball.
 
You know him do you? He might have gone out to slow the game down, but how can you discriminate against the lad and condone what he got :confused:

By that logic, we should go kicking anyone that acts like a ****. That puts half the players in the league out, but don't let that stop your vigilante ways. In fact, buy a cape and cowl and call yourself the chav smasher.

First of all, I think that Hazard's trying to kick the ball from under the lad, not intentionally kick him. But if Hazard kicked him intentionally then he deserves whatever comes his way, at the same time I have no sympathy for the lad. He acted like a ****. Just because I don't care whether he got a bit of a kick, doesn't mean I go around beating children or would encourage others to do so.
 
So, we have come to the conclusion that if someone is acting a bit of a boob, it's perfectly ok to push them to the ground and kick them?

I thought Swansea were pretty average and Chelsea were poor, looked disjointed going forward and personally would have substituted Torres earlier.
 
So, we have come to the conclusion that if someone is acting a bit of a boob, it's perfectly ok to push them to the ground and kick them?

I thought Swansea were pretty average and Chelsea were poor, looked disjointed going forward and personally would have substituted Torres earlier.

Again, LOL at the people suggesting he intentionally kicked him. Jesus.
 
Back
Top Bottom