Because Battlefield: 3 pretty much has everything that Bad Company has and more, so there's no real need for Bad Company anymore.
i nearly spat my beer or coffee out there.
No need for Bad Company 3 - what a shame
I know you're kidding us Wes
Because Battlefield: 3 pretty much has everything that Bad Company has and more, so there's no real need for Bad Company anymore.
True, i havent seen a game before or since that could expose a weak cpu overclock. 24 hours stable in intel burn test or prime 95 small fft or blend, fire up bfbc2. Crashed in under a minute. It put more load on the cpu than bf3 does. Bf3 is the more graphically demanding, strange though cause if you strip away the ugly blue filter. It is a very average looking game. And im talking from playing a lot of bc2, bf3 and moh 2010. Ive ran them all on the highest settings possible. Out of them all, moh 2010 is the best looking of the lot.Thats if you didn't crash![]()
Well, i've pre-ordered the standard edition. Getting Premium with it is a good deal IMO
i nearly spat my beer or coffee out there.
No need for Bad Company 3 - what a shame
I know you're kidding us Wes
Because Battlefield: 3 pretty much has everything that Bad Company has and more, so there's no real need for Bad Company anymore.
You don't get Premium with it, you get "a Premium expansion pack". They haven't announced Premium yet, and haven't said what's in the expansion pack. Or the Deluxe Bonus content.
Yeah the destruction in BF3 is miles better
Oh wait
This. We're dealing with EA here, c'mon.
new cod is supposed to have environment damage.
new cod is supposed to have environment damage.
All those that have wasted thousands of hours in the trash that is the shallow BF3, get to do it every year with a new battlefield, or shall I say a rehashed battlefield.
EA kills all things that were once good. I will not be supporting their ******* of the franchise.