You are wrong.
No you have seen many reasons, but you refuse to accept them.
You are entitled to your opinion and we are entitled to ours and of course more people will agree with you, nobody has said in this thread that everyone should like this game, it's obviously not for everyone, no game is. This may come across as an insult but it's not. On the weight of all of your comments in this thread and lack of responses to explain any actual concrete reasons why Infinite is a bad game or why you think that the shooting in doom is better with more depth. You cannot form any reasons you just continue to deride the game and the people who are answering to your posts. Again this is not meant as an insult but you're either deliberately trolling or you're just ignorant. You are unable to accept that other people can have an opinion about this game which differs from yours, you refuse to accept anyone else's view point, it borders on bigotry.
Bioshock Infinite is not a corridor game, if you think this then you clearly have not played infinite. Legendary, that's a recent corridor shooter, you can literally only take one very narrow path in that game. Bioshock infinite does not do this, there are entire areas for you to explore and side quests to complete, you could blast through running straight from objective to objective but you can also spend a lot of time wandering about and experiencing areas and combat which have nothing to do with the main narrative. Again, you are simply incorrect.
You keep calling it a corridor shooter but it is far from it. Forgetting that for a moment, linear games are not "bad", you keep lauding over us how the story in this is linear and laughable but you compare it to books and movies. Nothing can be more linear than a book or movie! And no, Bioshock should not be "x game" that you want it to be, it should be the game that the developers want it to be.
I also hope Half Life 3 is like this
But your point is moot, quite laughably so as the Half-Life series is FAMOUSLY a linear experience, more so than Bioshock. It's possible, but we're not talking about a linear corridor game are we.
All you have done in this thread is discount everyone's posts with derision, reviewers are wrong to give it 10/10 because they are paid, gamers are wrong to give it 10/10 because they are shallow sheeple. The other parts of your posts have just been completely incorrect or constructed fallacies.
Please, please put forward a rational argument.
Edit: As a bit of advice, what I would do if I were you is to present you opinion as an opinion rather than as fact. For example, you say:
A normal person would say:
You say:
A normal person would say:
So stop an think for a moment, give even just a second, maybe half a second to think to yourself "you know maybe, just maybe what I think in my head is not always correct. Maybe other people can have valid opinions too".
Oh and it's probably best to fact-check before you post, as you're actually pretty bad at this whole "gaming" thing. Things to check:
1) I'm going to say Half-life is not a linear shooter, I'll do a quick google, oh wait it is a linear shooter I'll not post that as it is incorrect.
2) I'm going to say that you cannot do vigor combinations in Bioshock infinite, I'll just google "vigor combos", oh wait there it is right at the top of the google results. I guess I won't post that either as it is also incorrect.
3) I'm going to post that "people who think shallow linear corridor games are "amazing" are bad for gaming", hmmm I had better gather some evidence first which correlates these two facts. Hmmmm there is none, I'll probably not post that either...
4) Now I don't have much to say at all.
Last edited:
.
...but I won't
