do you have a prior example of a security company, in a western country, carrying out a terrorist attack in which they have killed and maimed people in order to increase revenue?
do you have a prior example of a security company, in a western country, carrying out a terrorist attack in which they have killed and maimed people in order to increase revenue?
The preparations that go into an event like the state fair in Springfield include assessments from the Statewide Terrorism and Intelligence Center, which Thompson said is made up of officials from the state police, the U.S. Homeland Security Department and other law enforcement agencies.
This is kind of interesting, on the day Boston horrifically discovered what being bombed feels like, the US Supreme Court was turning down Boston College's request to keep tapes it had of recorded IRA members away from the NI Police.
http://www.wbur.org/2013/04/15/ira-tapes-boston-college
I wonder how the Dean of Boston College feels about protecting terrorist bombers today.
Of course:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...public-events-safety-20130416,0,3651740.story
Already talking about increasing security at london marathon as a result. Which is not proof of anything at all, just pointing out that if the motive was to encourage security industry it has been successful so far.
multi $billion on security industry and they still fail, the only solution is too hand them much more money and allow them to take away more of our liberties of course.
The problem as well is that is always the FBI that ends up in charge of investigating these terrorist attack and to be honest, FBI has the most terrible track record at investigating terrorist attacks. If they are not assisting in setting them up, they are investigating them, oh great.
If they want to find out who did it, upload all the evidence they get to the internet and it will be solved within a week. But they won't do that and they certainly won't even consider the possibility that the culprit was not some cliche terrorist that fits in to their nice little criteria of a terrorist. They investigate with a narrow view point and end up lying because they don't consider all possibilities.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-fake-terror-plots
Of course:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...public-events-safety-20130416,0,3651740.story
Already talking about increasing security at london marathon as a result. Which is not proof of anything at all, just pointing out that if the motive was to encourage security industry it has been successful so far.
multi $billion on security industry and they still fail, the only solution is too hand them much more money and allow them to take away more of our liberties of course.
The problem as well is that is always the FBI that ends up in charge of investigating these terrorist attack and to be honest, FBI has the most terrible track record at investigating terrorist attacks. If they are not assisting in setting them up, they are investigating them, oh great.
If they want to find out who did it, upload all the evidence they get to the internet and it will be solved within a week. But they won't do that and they certainly won't even consider the possibility that the culprit was not some cliche terrorist that fits in to their nice little criteria of a terrorist. They investigate with a narrow view point and end up lying because they don't consider all possibilities.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-fake-terror-plots
Out of interest, when you watch and hear Obama speak do you think it is all lies and that he is evil?
love this place as it much irish live in boston.. but this happened struck was much damaged..
Out of interest, when you watch and hear Obama speak do you think it is all lies and that he is evil?
Obama is nothing more than a PR man he has a lot less power than most people realize.
I wouldn't say evil to the core but he is certainly not a nice person, well he might pretend to be one, but in my opinion he is not a nice person. Obama reminds me of david blaine or darren brown. He reads what he is told and says what he needs to manipulate people.
More likely to be domestic extremism than international terrorism.
Who exactly is his puppet master groen?
I wouldn't say evil to the core but he is certainly not a nice person
The rest of the individuals within the government. The top folks at the alphabet soup FBI/SAIC/NSA/DOD/CIA/ and on and on as well as private sector. You didn't hear mr osama, sorry obama (sorry typo) was recruited and trained to be a president and had involvement with private companies as well?