I really doubt my ATI X800 256mb AGP can run Battlefield 4 in any playable frame rate.
Neither can the PS3 or Xbox 360.
I really doubt my ATI X800 256mb AGP can run Battlefield 4 in any playable frame rate.
Neither can the PS3 or Xbox 360.
I love posters like OP and how everyone gives such constructive responses to such an unconstructive question![]()
Well, I've not played it but surely all these people actually playing it right now would be best to judge!
It doesn't run at 1080p. Even the PS4 and XBOne don't run at 1080p, they do however manage 60fps constantly unlike the ps3/360 that dip as low as 16.
There's this thing called Google. You can use it to find answers faster than waiting for answers hereWhat are games like killzone runing at what kind of fps
Where did you get 1080p from?![]()
I really doubt my ATI X800 256mb AGP can run Battlefield 4 in any playable frame rate.
And read my second post, who has a PC matching the minimum spec back in 2006 for battlefield 4?
Anyone?
Pc is on the verge of 4K , consoles still cant hit 1080p reliably - that in itself should give you an indication of how they compare.
and from the looks of it whilst the new consoles have had a much needed texture boost, they still cant match the added AA/AF that pcs can easily pump out to make games look really crisp.
of course you need a half decent GPU nowadays, but your talking £200 to play the likes of BF4 etc on max, providing you have a half decent CPU from the last 5 years.
well yeah its new tech that costs £2,000. not to mention there's no movies or tv that can put it to use. not many people willing to run a pc on a 70inch 4k tv for £2,000 when they could just run a multiple monitor set upAnd yet nobody has a 4k screen yet
What are games like killzone runing at what kind of fps