I'm pretty sure the scene in irreversible is as bad if not worse than anything in these simulated rape porns. So why should one be ok and the other give you 3 years in jail for having it on your PC? It doesn't make any sense to me.
Goooooogle blocks 100,000 search terms for kiddyporn!
- Thread starter Orionaut
- Start date
I'm pretty sure the scene in irreversible is as bad if not worse than anything in these simulated rape porns. So why should one be ok and the other give you 3 years in jail for having it on your PC? It doesn't make any sense to me.
BING! Wrong. It was for exactly this reason that the BBFC cut the child rape scene in A Ma Soeur! on DVD but left the cinema release intact, since people could replay the DVD version again and again out of context. It's not about the film, it's about the scene, which can be taken as porn under certain mindsets.
Last edited:
if that's the film i'm thinking of, where the hell did that ending come from?
As far as I remember, the fat young girl runs into the woods at the end after her sister is killed, only to be pursued by the now murderous "maniac". In the DVD it's rather awkward because he just pins her down and then it cuts, so the rape is implied. However, it does come across rather strangely and when I saw it I thought, "eh, what was supposed to have happened there?!"
GOOD. No time for peados. Or however you spell it.
Parents sent me to a private education boarding school, and in our french class the teacher used to record us, and in his Star Trek club, never thought much of it, I mean what 11 year old does right? Turns out he got arrested and inprisoned for being part of a kiddy pr0n ring later on, makes me shiver to know he wanted to do bad things to me and everyone else in my class!
Parents sent me to a private education boarding school, and in our french class the teacher used to record us, and in his Star Trek club, never thought much of it, I mean what 11 year old does right? Turns out he got arrested and inprisoned for being part of a kiddy pr0n ring later on, makes me shiver to know he wanted to do bad things to me and everyone else in my class!
Just as I left senior school ('88) our drama teachers got caught.. they'd borrowed the school video equipment to record their noncing of school kids in their home and forgot to take the video out when they returned the gear.
Yeah, same with our coach driver Cliff, an abhorrant ogre of a man. He kept offering afterschool trips and taking us up strange alleyways, no doubt as some sort of 'recce'. Later he got busted for child ppr0nz.
This seems like a scary bit of legislation
3 years for possession of a video ????
I could go out and stab someone and get less or rape someone and get not a lot more
But it's a slippery slope
Today it's rape porn what's next? Any porn that doesn't meet a government standard?
It smacks of one of the women's rights groups lobbying hard and government caving with a knee jerk reaction
3 years for possession of a video ????
I could go out and stab someone and get less or rape someone and get not a lot more
But it's a slippery slope
Today it's rape porn what's next? Any porn that doesn't meet a government standard?
It smacks of one of the women's rights groups lobbying hard and government caving with a knee jerk reaction
Your name has just been entered in to our database for the terms Lolita and Kiddie Fap. Thank you for using a website indexed by Google.com.
Well, its a difficult thing to tackle and you need to start somewhere.
I think most people would agree that limiting access to indecent images of minors is a beneficial thing. Even if in reality it (this particular measure of blocking certain words on Google) wont do jack to stop those who are already doing it.
As for having videos and I assume watching videos?? Of rape porn and it being classified as illegal with a punishment of up to 3 years (is it classified as UP TO<<< 3 years? thats a big difference than just 3 years) then yer some will say that is one step away from a pretty slippery slope into dictating what is acceptable and what isn't.
However I think blocking and making it illegal to view rape porn is a good thing or at least not a bad thing. Let's be real for a second; rape is a horrible thing, its illegal and just so far away from a "normal" thing to be wanting to watch. I fail to see the issue with making it illegal.
I think most people would agree that limiting access to indecent images of minors is a beneficial thing. Even if in reality it (this particular measure of blocking certain words on Google) wont do jack to stop those who are already doing it.
As for having videos and I assume watching videos?? Of rape porn and it being classified as illegal with a punishment of up to 3 years (is it classified as UP TO<<< 3 years? thats a big difference than just 3 years) then yer some will say that is one step away from a pretty slippery slope into dictating what is acceptable and what isn't.
However I think blocking and making it illegal to view rape porn is a good thing or at least not a bad thing. Let's be real for a second; rape is a horrible thing, its illegal and just so far away from a "normal" thing to be wanting to watch. I fail to see the issue with making it illegal.
Last edited:
I always like to remind people in these threads that it's also illegal to have pictures* of fictitious creatures (eg minotaurs) in sexual situations, if it could reasonably be believed that the minotaur depicted was underage. How do you decide? Apparently you show the image to a group and see how many think the minotaur is under 18.
I think it sums up the direction we're moving in quite nicely. Yes there is real crime being committed by a select few individuals. People you want to catch and criminalise.
But I wonder if our response as a society is becoming to cast the net as wide as possible, and hope that at least some of the people we brand as deviants were indeed the dangerous ones.
*not derived from actual abuse images, or real people. 100% the product of imagination.
I think it sums up the direction we're moving in quite nicely. Yes there is real crime being committed by a select few individuals. People you want to catch and criminalise.
But I wonder if our response as a society is becoming to cast the net as wide as possible, and hope that at least some of the people we brand as deviants were indeed the dangerous ones.
*not derived from actual abuse images, or real people. 100% the product of imagination.
Yes but the age of consent for humans is 16 in this country, not for minotaurs. We don't stamp ages of consent on badgers or rabbits.
I don't know what the age of consent is for minotaurs but I don't think the necessity to create a benchmark has arisen.
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Mar 2010
- Posts
- 5,038
Have you been propositioning Minotaurs, badgers and rabbits?
Have you been propositioning Minotaurs, badgers and rabbits?
Doesn't matter if I do, there's no age of consent I need to worry about.
Well, bestiality may be illegal but if I do it in an enclosed field there's no-one to tell. And the minotaur tryst is just between myself and Greek myth.
Possessing an image (drawing, naturally) of an underage minotaur is an offense which can get you on the sex offenders register.
All that has to happen is a group of people have to conclude that the minotaur looks underage (or that the artist is suggesting this). This could be something as simple as the minotaur holding a teddy bear whilst .... erm, you know.
That's not a joke! This is real legislation that already exists.
My point is, who the hell cares what you get off to, if no real children are involved? Well, apparently the people making/enforcing our laws care a whole bunch.
Judges already ruled that the target of abuse does not have to be *real* for the abuse to have occurred. I kid you not - that's an actual legal precedent.