The one that pulled the trigger, was a bad one. He acted irresponsibly and absolutely trigger happy, nearly killing his team mate and endangering the lives of others. Not to mention wrongly killing Duggan.
Yeah the officer messed up, with very serious consequences - both injuring a colleague and killing someone who was perhaps unarmed at the time... he was possibly mid way through throwing the gun or had already thrown it a second or two before being shot.. was it just his mobile phone in his hand etc... It wasn't unlawful though - the officer had a reasonable belief that he was an immediate threat. As for trigger happy - that officer has likely stopped people hundreds of times before... without shooting any of them. When a suspect is known to be armed and dangerous, doesn't comply and is behaving erratically (leaping from a cab with a firearm when stopped) its going to significantly increase the chances that that the police will end up firing. Duggan could quite easily have just stayed in his seat and stuck his hands where they could see them... he'd still be alive today if he wasn't such a moron.
If anyone of us, were to pull the same thing off, as in shoot someone who didn't actually have a gun on them, we would be criminally accountable. But V53 gets off scott free, thanks to some clever PR.
You don't seem to understand how a this thing worked - the jury weren't asked to consider press stories, spin, PR etc.. they were presented with evidence, witness testimony and asked to be objective... any clever PR had very little to do with this hearing.
But what's worse is how the Met all banded together, made stories up, went about tarnishing the name of Duggan, far far worse than the small time crook that he was.
[...]
Duggan didn't start the riots, he was laying in a morgue dead. He leaves four children and a family.. Do you really think a hardened criminal would work as a clothes retailer? Big time drug lord that he is?
small time crooks don't carry guns...
His family sparked the riots by leading half a council estate up to the local police station for an impromptu protest, demanding immediate answers before an inquiry had even properly started.
I'm not sure what you'd class as a hardened criminal but you're being a bit naive if you're basing that denial on his convictions or the fact they stated he had a job doing x...
A few people have pointed out that his actual convictions have only been for cannabis and sale of stolen goods... Its like trying to argue that Al Capone wasn't a violent thug by pointing out that his only conviction was for tax evasion... (not that Duggan's career has been anywhere near as lucrative as Capone's)
Duggan had several arrests for firearms related incidents, guns found in cars he's been traveling in, arrests for murder, attempted murder, intelligence linking him to a a shooting in a nightclub, shooting in a club carpark etc..etc.. He was a known gang member, had close friends serving life for murder (the two from the picture posted earlier in the thread). Lastly the fact he was in possession of an illegal firearm in itself negates any notion that he was a 'small time crook'