Oh dear, the benefit scroungers are scared!

TheLegendOfMart said:
I like how you ignore most of what I said to try and find things that aren't there.

Notice I said Mac and not Macbook, I sold my PC and I have £300 worth of hardware that is running hackintosh that is not worth selling, also I was looking for the mouse in OCTOBER, I got made redundant in NOVEMBER. Reading comprehension helps.

I sold a lot of stuff before I started claiming to pay bills and keep the amount of time I am on benefits to a minimum, but yeah you keep reading things that aren't there.

You know what **** this, I'm not justifying myself to some jumped up little **** who thinks he is better than everyone because he started up a business.
Click to expand...

Why don't your family help you with living costs instead of spending loads of money on toys? Or even borrow money from them to start a business, instead of toys?
 
86JR said:
Why don't your family help you with living costs instead of spending loads of money on toys? Or even borrow money from them to start a business, instead of toys?
Click to expand...

They don't help me because that's benefit fraud?

I've paid into the system I think I am entitled to be on benefits without getting handouts from mummy and daddy.
 
Last edited:
Tefal said:
em iirc the top 10% pay 95% of all income tax.

i dunno about you but that seems somewhat unfair doesn't it?
Click to expand...
You are aware that's a result of having a disproportionate amount of the income.

The rich pay most of the tax argument is indicative of our income & wealth distribution. If I managed to scam the system in such a way I had 100% of the income in the UK, I'd be paying 100% of the tax.

Viewing this imbalance in isolation & ignoring the wage distribution which causes it will always appear to be less reasonable than in-fact it is.

Tefal said:
so every single person from her school is now on benefits yeah?

or did maybe some actually work hard and succeed.
Click to expand...
Statistically pending on the quality of the school a higher proportion of them will on benefits yes.

It's not all or nothing in any of these cases, it's a matter of degree & the shades in between.

The underline point is tax rates need to be set at such a level in which the society is able to function & the citizens able to live to continue cyclic consumption which feeds the corporate machine.

If the average short-sighted extreme right nut-job actually managed to get into power they would destroy their customer base in a matter of months, resulting in a huge drop in living standards across the nation.

There is a reason why the current government are not as right wing as some would like, it simply doesn't work.

The average Joe in the street needs to have enough money in his pocket to buy goods & services which in turn generate capital for the rich, without any safety nets/wage redistribution to pay for education/police/health (as the wages are not high enough for the individual to absorb these costs) - in theory you could have a state with level little welfare (small government), but for it to function the average population would require a greater share of the wages to pay or save for the potential problems experienced later in life themselves.

Whichever way this economic pendulum swings a balance must be maintained for the system to function.
 
Last edited:
Haha just done some reading back into 86JR posts, seems the audi masturbator image I pegged him as is correct, hes 27 and looking into buying an Audi, bet he has the sunglasses picked ready to look like a complete ****.

I find it hilarious how someone is only 27 is whining about how his tax money is paying for people on benefits.
 
Last edited:
TheLegendOfMart said:
Haha just done some reading back into 86JR posts, seems the audi masturbator image I pegged him as is correct, hes 27 and looking into buying an Audi, bet he has the sunglasses picked ready to look like a complete ****.

I find it hilarious how someone is only 27 is whining about how his tax money is paying for people on benefits, try paying into the system for another decade or two little boy.
Click to expand...

I already have an Audi thanks. And yeah, I have aviator's

1451452_597849686919463_296762772_n.jpg


Old man, in a decade or two I will be a multi millionaire if my income grows at its current rate :D Probably paying for multi million people like you to live too!
 
I would rather kill myself than be on benefits. But only if I left the money for my funeral behind. I was on benefits for 6 weeks, never felt so low and so much like a leech of society as I did then. I don't know how people manage it long term.
 
Tefal said:
She had access to the exact same "educational.background" as everyone else the fact she squandered the opportunity doesn't make it everyone elses fault she's now useless
Click to expand...

What a load of ******! You are talking out of your arse.
 
86JR said:
I would rather kill myself than be on benefits. But only if I left the money for my funeral behind. I was on benefits for 6 weeks, never felt so low and so much like a leech of society as I did then. I don't know how people manage it long term.
Click to expand...

Please don't tarnish everyone with the same brush, not everyone on benefits is a leech.
 
86JR said:
I already have an Audi thanks. And yeah, I have aviator's

1451452_597849686919463_296762772_n.jpg


Old man, in a decade or two I will be a multi millionaire if my income grows at its current rate :D Probably paying for multi million people like you to live too!
Click to expand...


lol 27 going on 50!

and by the way, those specs are dog poo compared to my gold gucci aviators from 1980...and im a socialist! ha!
 
Last edited:
What do you do 86JR ? Not too bothered if you dont wanna say, just trying to build a character/personality to the millionaire face.
 
elmarko said:
You are aware that's a result of having a disproportionate amount of the income.

The rich pay most of the tax argument is indicative of our income & wealth distribution. If I managed to scam the system in such a way I had 100% of the income in the UK, I'd be paying 100% of the tax.

Viewing this imbalance in isolation & ignoring the wage distribution which causes it will always appear to be less reasonable than in-fact it is.

Statistically pending on the quality of the school a higher proportion of them will on benefits yes.

It's not all or nothing in any of these cases, it's a matter of degree & the shades in between.

The underline point is tax rates need to be set at such a level in which the society is able to function & the citizens able to live to continue cyclic consumption which feeds the corporate machine.

If the average short-sighted extreme right nut-job actually managed to get into power they would destroy their customer base in a matter of months, resulting in a huge drop in living standards across the nation.

There is a reason why the current government are not as right wing as some would like, it simply doesn't work.

The average Joe in the street needs to have enough money in his pocket to buy goods & services which in turn generate capital for the rich, without any safety nets/wage redistribution to pay for education/police/health (as the wages are not high enough for the individual to absorb these costs) - in theory you could have a state with level little welfare (small government), but for it to function the average population would require a greater share of the wages to pay or save for the potential problems experienced later in life themselves.

Whichever way this economic pendulum swings a balance must be maintained for the system to function.
Click to expand...

I've not read so many uninformed envy-laden half-truths about economics for quite a while.
 
robgmun said:
It wouldn't be far off, the Russell Brand lite type of comments from the loony left in these forums recently just shows how far removed from reality really are, i'll admit you're no where near as bad as most of them. But they're some real socialist wack jobs on here that would effectively want to see this country an over-ran wasteland.
Click to expand...

Yes it would be much better run by overweight, racist morons with a penchant for capital punishment and getting rid of anyone that isn't white, except for their mail order Asian wives.
How is Nick taking the bankruptcy out of interest?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom