Do you consider homosexuality to be a form of nature's cruelty or something similar?
I'm sorry but that's just an incredibly stupid response
Do you consider homosexuality to be a form of nature's cruelty or something similar?
Distcrimination is discrimination, but it's a little bit different when we're talking about the persecution of black and brown people!
You what? Infirtility is generally caused by complications with the reproductive organs... Natural. How do you want me to relate homosexuality to this argument?
Sterility is a disability, do you consider homosexuality a disability too or something similar? It's a simple question, why is it so hard to answer it?
NVP(or anyone) is being a homo' a natural thing ? That's the question.
if its Natural then how can it be abhorrent, as its "for use of a better word" gods will.
or do we take the line that Homosexuals have something wrong with their personalities and should/can be treated the same way as infertility.
Sterility is a disability, do you consider homosexuality a disability too or something similar? It's a simple question, why is it so hard to answer it?
Could you state why that would be a bad thing?, we spend less on the NHS & already get a service far superior to nations which spend a comparable amount.So I see Labour have come up with a fresh and exciting election pledge; throw more money at the NHS (possibly through raising NI). My word.
I don't see why an opinion on homosexuality is required for this discussion, it will simply cause offence to some and potentially derail this thread - the point was raised as something but I will humor you both for a second with my opinion, and that is all this is my opinion.
Talking purely from a naturalistic viewpoint, Life is about procreation so that a species can survive. If a superior species is capable of such intelligent thought that it has determined the key to life is this most basic of natural instincts, to procreate, yet one member of the species decides against this as fluctuations in hormone levels make them behave differently to another member of the same species... is this natural or against nature? It may be against their chemical make-up, but it is also against Life itself - You tell me which is "more natural"?
Not everything is black and white.
Could you state why that would be a bad thing?, we spend less on the NHS & already get a service far superior to nations which spend a comparable amount.
Isn't throwing money exactly what Labour did last time? It didn't solve the problem, it never does. The result was the shambolic PFI scheme, too much middle management and inefficient spending.
Could you state why that would be a bad thing?, we spend less on the NHS & already get a service far superior to nations which spend a comparable amount.
Throwing money at it correctly however would see great things. Just because Labour were hopeless are delivering an idea, doesn't make the idea a bad one.
Everything is natural, the opposite of natural is supernatural & gay people are not mythological creatures.I don't see why an opinion on homosexuality is required for this discussion, it will simply cause offence to some and potentially derail this thread - but I will humor you both for a second with my opinion, and that is all this is, my opinion.
Talking purely from a naturalistic viewpoint, Life is about procreation so that a species can survive. If a superior species is capable of such intelligent thought that it has determined the key to life is this most basic of natural instincts, to procreate, yet one member of the species decides against this as fluctuations in hormone levels make them behave differently to another member of the same species... is this natural or against nature? It may be against their chemical make-up, but it is also against Life itself - You tell me which is "more natural"?
Not everything is black and white.
Flawed argument, I could disregard any suggestion on anything by implying it's only outcome would be void of any benefits & only include the potential negatives.Because it would be wasted by higher ups by hiring more middle-management and failed projects (Billions wasted on a scarped IT system anyone?)
Extra money in itself is fine but it would have to be tightly micro-managed to an inch of it's life and the track record of that has been abysmal
You mean residing over one of the strongest periods of growth until the global financial crisis?.Agreed, but trusting Labour with the keys of economy again? Trollalololololol!!!!
Throwing money at it correctly however would see great things. Just because Labour were hopeless are delivering an idea, doesn't make the idea a bad one.
Agreed, but trusting Labour with the keys of economy again? Trollalololololol!!!!
Reproduction is a means for a species to continue, it's not a purpose - that's your subjective evaluation & an attempt of applying meaning to something which objectively has none. Regardless of either of these facts it's also as 'natural' as anything can be & see in other animal species.