Do your stats tell you how often he made runs that created space for other players? Do your stats tell you how many times he won the ball back that started moves that led to goals? Do your stats tell you how often he was invloved in moves that led to goals?
There's a reason all of the pundits and commentators rate him and it's not just because of goal and assist stats like you throw at people to prove your point so often. He's world class and your dislike of him doesn't actually change that fact.
None of which disproves anything I said. I didn't say he didn't play well in those games... anywhere, though he has been poor in many of them over the past 4 seasons. I said he didn't score, and the problem being he took a LOT of shots and still failed to score.
http://www.espnfc.com/gamecast/statistics/id/367158/statistics.html
vs Chelsea, Gerrard took 9 shots(mostly long range from recollection), didn't score, Suarez next most with 5, 2 on target.
http://www.espnfc.com/gamecast/statistics/id/387277/statistics.html
vs Arsenal, he took 8 shots, which was 5 more than sturridge.
http://www.espnfc.com/gamecast/statistics/id/367311/statistics.html
Vs Suarez, joint top number of shots, no goal.
http://www.espnfc.com/gamecast/statistics/id/367320/statistics.html
vs City, Suarez most shots 5 vs next most which is 3.
http://www.espnfc.com/gamecast/statistics/id/367365/statistics.html
loss against Hull, Suarez with 5 shots, no one else took more than 1.
http://www.espnfc.com/gamecast/statistics/id/367392/statistics.html
vs Arsenal, again joint most number of shots taken.
http://www.espnfc.com/gamecast/statistics/id/380821/statistics.html
vs Utd, again 8 shots, again the next highest down the list is 3.
yes he will create space for others, but clearly others have made chances for him, more than anyone else by a large amount. He's either by far and away taking the most shots or joint top except in one game where Gerrard shot more. There is no fundamental difference in number of chances or style, or how his team mates play between Norwich and Chelsea. They team makes Suarez more chances than anyone else in the majority of games. He fails to convert them in the biggest games, it's not the team failing to create them for him.
Sometimes Ronaldo will play like poo but still score a game winning goal that changes the title against a crucial team, that is football. If someone has eleventy billion chances to score against the best teams and just never does, I just find it hard to describe that player as one of the VERY best, like the best 3 players in the world.
In fact I find it pretty absurd, good, sure, great, sure, one of the best 3, no. You can't fundamentally screw up against better teams that often and be considered the best.
It's one thing if the team you are in means you have 10 shots against Norwich but none, or maybe one against the best teams. But that is very clearly not the case for Suarez.
We're talking about the absolute best of the best players, not really really good. You're claiming top 3 players in the world. yet, there are players who make that difference and score those crucial goals in the biggest games, and those who don't. I find it very hard to take the claim seriously that Suarez, spurning chance after chance after chance, failing to score in all the biggest games... is amongst the group of the absolute best. Near the best, sure, but in that group, for me, no.