Been there. Done that
Some perspective...
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...k-value-and-get-some-perspective-9563690.html
He's going to get a 6 match international ban. At most. Because although FIFA are possibly the most corrupt organisation on Earth, they're not the FA. What us plebs think about this is irrelevant. And so it should be.
Clearly a Liverpool fan !
I can't believe you call that "perspective". lol That is absurd. Can't believe that got published in the paper!
He did not fix a match, which strikes at the very heart of sport.
Does he just use that as an excuse to bite someone?
He did not use performance-enhancing drugs, which is the most insidious form of cheating.
Which will get less than drug taking, and those get a ban for yearssss.
Fair enough. But we are not talking about cheating, we are talking about violent conduct that if it is off the pitch, he would be arrested.
He did not go over the top and break an opponent’s leg, or shatter an opponent’s nose or cheekbone with an elbow.
He conveniently enough purposely left out the important point of
intent. You can do both of the above unintentionally in football.
He did not attack a referee (he has done that, head-butting an official, but that was 11 years ago when he was playing youth team football at 16 and he received a long ban).
So what if it was 11 years ago? It only shows that the guy had over a decade and is STILL violent !
In my mind these are all worse acts than biting an opponent,
His mind...which is his opinion and carries as much weight as anyone else's.
especially given it was in the heat of the moment,
Heat of the moment? What? the ball was nowhere near him at the time, and Chiellini was facing
away from him ! That's his excuse? Heat of the moment and we can now start biting other players? Is he using the Insanity Defence?
and he did not pursue the act long enough to draw blood.
Draw blood? Do we REALLY want to wait until he draws blood before throwing the book at him? 3rd time biting isn't enough?
What kind of medication is this guy on?
What an awful article.