She needs to be stopped!!!

spoffle said:
Still though, you're not a vegetarian, and as such shouldn't call yourself one. If people are ignorant to the term pescatarian it's because of situations like this.





Vegan diets aren't super healthy though. People should eat more veg, that's for sure but vegans often have it the other way, because they're eating nothing but plant based food, they are lacking in nutrition in other areas. Vegan diets aren't automatically "super healthy" because they're vegan or are eating nothing but veg, a vegan diet may be better than a typical meat eater's diet simply because the vast majority of meat eaters are not health conscious and don't care what they eat. They consider microwave ready meals to be good eating.

If you compare a health conscious meat eater, who follows a good diet and is as meticulous about what they eat as a vegan, to a vegan, the vegan will be the one lacking in health 9 times out of 10.
Click to expand...

Yep, You can't just jump on bandwagon and say I'm only going to eat veg now. Need to know what areas you may be lacking certain things and where to get them from. Requires a LOT of research to do right tbh if it's something that someone wants to consider doing.

I also think it may work for a while depending on personal goals, then also later on down the line switch it up.

I toyed with the idea of vegan but I realised it's incredibly strict. Things such as eggs etc are just such a great source of extra nutrients + I want to start using whey protein again to supplement training and obviously you can't even touch that.
 
Last edited:
spoffle said:
PETA don't advertise what they really do with the animals they "save" (They kill A LOT of animals on a daily basis just because they don't think they should be pets). I would expect the vast majority of PETA supporters have no idea that they do this sort of stuff.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-j-winograd/peta-kills-puppies-kittens_b_2979220.html
Click to expand...

I might be missing something, but what's the connection between PETA and WWF?

Edit: Ah, never mind, I see your point.
 
Last edited:
McBain said:
I might be missing something, but what's the connection between PETA and WWF?
Click to expand...

Royal Rumble XI

The match between Taylor and Bigelow brought the WWF mainstream press coverage. The reactions to the match were mixed; some people thought that Taylor performed surprisingly well for a non-wrestler. Others thought that the WWF pushing a football player to defeat a wrestler made professional wrestling look bad. Reviews of the event as a whole have also been mixed, and the event has been called both the worst WrestleMania of all time and the event that saved the WWF.
 
No she really doesn't. You need a rethink.
Nothing wrong with hunting or enjoying it. It's not poaching. UK's stupid attitude towards these things is well stupid.

What she's doing is evil, while you tuck into cruelly raised chicken and pork. Which is far worse.
 
Last edited:
Efour said:
Royal Rumble XI

The match between Taylor and Bigelow brought the WWF mainstream press coverage. The reactions to the match were mixed; some people thought that Taylor performed surprisingly well for a non-wrestler. Others thought that the WWF pushing a football player to defeat a wrestler made professional wrestling look bad. Reviews of the event as a whole have also been mixed, and the event has been called both the worst WrestleMania of all time and the event that saved the WWF.
Click to expand...

WWF was the shizzle back in the day.
 
SkodaMart said:
Hunting's great, it's one of mankind's most primal instinct's.

Let's all do it! Yaaaay!!

And when there are no animals left, let's keep on hunting.








Totally ****ing irresponsible, hunting for fun is a disgrace.

Hunting to feed your family - OK, taking what you need from nature and nothing more. - OK.
Click to expand...

This is your typical Facebook logic.

These animals would have been killed for one reason or another anyway so surely it's better to make money from someone who wants to kill this sort of animal by letting them hunt, the money which in turn can be invested in whatever programs these sites run.

Or

Ban them from shooting animals which probably would have been culled anyway and they pay some random guide to take them shoooting random wildlife unregulated.

I'm not sure on the exact prices but from the pictures she's posing in she would have paid enough money to buy a fair sized house. Probably more than any of us have contributed for conservation.
 
Tefal said:
No my argument is we're not ****ing up this word we're changing it quite slightly compared to previous species.
Click to expand...

Ah OK. So because we're doing less damage than say, a meteor strike, or another ice age, we really don't need to concern ourselves with the "trivial" damage that we are capable of.

OK, I feel much better now. Let's get huntin' and killin'.
 
Antony101 said:
It does good because only people that hunt are willing to pay to keep these animals alive.

The only reason most of these animals are there to be hunted is because hunters pay a fortune in fees and membership so that they can increase the number of these animals.
Click to expand...

The montage above your post must have cost a fortune to hunt, the deaths probably paid the wages and expenses of teams of game wardens, the sad fact is that in our world at this time paid hunting is the only chance of survival for some of these species.
 
Glaucus said:
What she's doing is evil, while you tuck into cruelly raised chicken and pork. Which is far worse.
Click to expand...

I am extremely against animals being killed for sport. But I know nothing will change, so I just don't really pay any attention to it. Ignorance is Bliss right?

I do however disagree with this comment.

I do not think you can say its worse for us to enjoy eating food that was the product of cruelly kept live stock. Yes its cruel that the animals are kept that way but that in no way is the fault of the person eating that food.

If we all boycotted it in a mass way, maybe it would stop happening, but its not realistic.

So it is not worse than evil to enjoy the end product, It is evil to take enjoyment in the actual killing. Which you do when you hunt for sport.
 
Just lol. If people refused to eat it, then they wouldn't produce it like that. so it's absolutely the consumers fault.

There is zero wrong with hunting, it's what we are designed to do. It's also far better than 98% of the population, that is utterly clueless about food production.

It's a sad state of affairs that the uk is like this. Most other countries are not.
 
Last edited:
ocukposter.jpg
 
Glaucus said:
Just lol. If people refused to eat it, then they wouldn't produce it like that. so it's absolutely the consumers fault.

There is zero wrong with hunting, it's what we are designed to do. It's also far better than 98% of the population, that is utterly clueless about food production.

It's a sad state of affairs that the uk is like this. Most other countries are not.
Click to expand...

Its not a singular persons fault though, Which is my point. My not eating meat, or only eating organically sourced food will in no way alter anything atall.

I agree that battery farms, etc are cruel. But my choosing to not buy those products means nothing. The animal will still be slaughtered and packaged and eaten.

However my choice to not pick up a gun and kill an animal, and enjoy it. while smiling for the camera. Well that means the animal won't die, atleast not by my hand.

--

You feel its okay to kill animals then, I remember a person popping up on my news feed many many months ago. She was disgusted that a friend of hers had picked up a cat, and killed it. By swinging it against a wall.

What are your feelings on that? To me that guy was sadistic. Evil.

But surely it's human nature to kill animals?
 
wannabedamned said:
Its not a singular persons fault though, Which is my point. My not eating meat, or only eating organically sourced food will in no way alter anything atall.

I agree that battery farms, etc are cruel. But my choosing to not buy those products means nothing. The animal will still be slaughtered and packaged and eaten.

However my choice to not pick up a gun and kill an animal, and enjoy it. while smiling for the camera. Well that means the animal won't die, atleast not by my hand.

--

You feel its okay to kill animals then, I remember a person popping up on my news feed many many months ago. She was disgusted that a friend of hers had picked up a cat, and killed it. By swinging it against a wall.

What are your feelings on that? To me that guy was sadistic. Evil.

But surely it's human nature to kill animals?
Click to expand...

What a silly argument. If you don't buy meat raised like that farmers won't grow it. If everyone who thinks like that would stop believing such nonsense. Then sales of such poorly raised animals would decrees significantly.

And another silly argument. Killing someone's pet, is not the same as a clean kill of a wild animal.
 
wannabedamned said:
I remember a person popping up on my news feed many many months ago. She was disgusted that a friend of hers had picked up a cat, and killed it. By swinging it against a wall.

What are your feelings on that? To me that guy was sadistic. Evil.
Click to expand...

The cat wasn't part of a managed conservation plan and as such it didn't need to die.
The two examples are not related (unless you think emotional input has some value in conservation)


To all the people decrying this, what is your plan to preserve what is left of the wildlife in Africa?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom